Report: State prosecutors discriminate against Jews in W. Bank demolitions

Report State prosecutor

December 6, 2009 23:53
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A report published on Sunday by Regavim, the movement for protection of national lands, accused the State Prosecutor's Office of discriminating against Jews. The report claims there is differential treatment of Arabs and Jews when it comes to responding to Supreme Court petitions regarding house demolitions in Judea and Samaria. According to the report, when Arabs petition the court against house demolitions, the State Prosecutors office drags its feet and fails to respond, resulting in many of the cases never coming before a judge and never being settled. The report states that when Jews petition the court to prevent the demolition, the prosecution responds rapidly and effectively and the houses are quickly demolished by court order. In both cases, after a petition is filed to the court, a temporary injunction is put in place and until the petition is heard, the house cannot be demolished. Regavim's study found 400 petitions, dealing with 700 Arab homes, which were still awaiting a response, but nearly none of Jewish settlers. In one case Regavim found that a petition by an Arab homeowner was unattended for 12 years. Regavim's lawyer, Amir Fisher, said that ongoing neglect by the state prosecution means that the injunction remains in place and the Arab structure is never demolished. "Any Arab construction violator in Judea and Samaria who petitions the Supreme Court gains immunity under the auspices of the state prosecution's Supreme Court division," read the report. "The report points to a clear political bias that cannot be mistaken among Supreme Court division lawyers," said Regavim director Yitzhak Zargari. "The movement will pass the report along to the Justice Minister and to Knesset members with a demand to examine the reports findings and provide answers to the public." In response, the Justice Ministry spokesman said that the ministry rejects the accusations of political considerations in judicial processes. "Demolition order priorities are set up by the relevant professional bodies, namely the defense establishment and the IDF. The Supreme Court division lawyers of the State Prosecutor's Office represent the respondents in the Supreme Court," the spokesman said. "It is worth noting that according to data collected on house demolitions in Judea and Samaria between 1997 and 2009, a total of 2,450 Palestinian-owned structures were demolished, compared to 1,230 Jewish-owned structures. "The numbers surely don't validate Regavim's claims."

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town