Post-modern biography

With apparently only a passing interest in the ‘facts’ of Freud’s life story, Adam Phillips focuses much more on what can be ascertained from the father of psychoanalysis’s own writing and interests.

August 14, 2014 13:40
Sigmund Freud

International Psychoanalytic Congress, 1911, with Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung in the center.. (photo credit: US LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/WIKIMEDIA)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Central to Adam Phillips’s Becoming Freud: The Making of a Psychoanalyst is a supreme paradox: A psychoanalyst with a literary flair has undertaken a project he himself acknowledges is doomed from the outset. The very endeavor of biography and autobiography, Phillips tells us at the beginning of what is ostensibly a biography of Sigmund Freud, has more to do with “how ingenious we are at not knowing ourselves, and how knowing ourselves – or the ways in which we have been taught to know ourselves, not least through the conventions of biography and autobiography – has become the problem rather than the solution.”

Biography is problematic for a number of reasons, explains Phillips. Complexities are simplified for the sake of coherence and plot. Plausible life stories become a refuge. The most painful, and therefore most revealing, experiences of childhood are repressed and remain unknown even to the person who experienced them. Often the very nature of one’s experiences – whether they are positive or negative – depends on how these experiences are interpreted – either by the person doing the experiencing or by the biographer. Events might not have even happened as experienced in the first place. The biographical “fact” might not just be irrelevant, it might be downright misleading.


Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Cookie Settings