'Arabs may not target Israel at upcoming IAEA meeting'

Western diplomats: Arab ambassadors to UN nuclear watchog say they won't put forward text summoning Israel to join a global anti-nuclear treaty.

By REUTERS
September 15, 2011 13:29
2 minute read.
IAEA board of governors meeting in Vienna, March.

IAEA meeting_311. (photo credit: Stringer Austria / Reuters)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

VIENNA - Arab states are signalling that they will refrain from targeting Israel over its assumed nuclear arsenal at a UN atomic agency meeting next week, diplomats said on Thursday, a move that if confirmed would be welcomed by the West.

Two Arab diplomats appeared to substantiate the development, telling Reuters it should be seen as a "confidence-building measure" and a "good gesture from Arab states" to foster wider-ranging efforts to create a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


RELATED:
Israel braces for Arab offensive at IAEA assembly
West unimpressed by Iran's nuclear 'openness'

As in 2009 and 2010, Arab nations had been expected to submit a resolution at a Sept. 19-23 annual gathering of member states of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) summoning Israel to join a global anti-nuclear treaty.

The United States and its Western allies say such a non-binding but symbolically significant resolution singling out Israel for blame could undermine broader steps aimed at banning weapons of mass destruction in the region.

Two Western diplomats told Reuters that Arab ambassadors to the IAEA had told them this week that they now did not plan to put forward the text this year. "If true, obviously we would welcome it," one of them said.

But one European ambassador said there had not yet been a formal announcement from the group of Arab nations at the IAEA about the issue, suggesting there position might still change before next week. "I'm still a bit nervous," he said.

At the 2009 annual General Conference of IAEA member states, an Arab-proposed resolution expressing concern at "Israeli Nuclear Capabilities" was approved in a close vote.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


Brought up again last year, it was defeated at the conference after a bruising diplomatic battle, in which Washington and its allies lobbied intensively against the text.

Arab states already in June asked for "Israeli Nuclear Capabilities" to be put on the agenda of this year's meeting, and it may still be debated. But they have not circulated any draft resolution on the issue, diplomats say.

One Western envoy said the Arab states may have decided not to submit it this year as it was likely to be voted down again.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

File: Jordan's King Abdullah II greets Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House in Washin
October 22, 2018
Is Israel’s position in region as secure as it looks?

By SETH J. FRANTZMAN