Israeli defense experts doubt US will intervene in Syria

Despite pressure on Obama to intervene in Syria following the large-scale chemical attack, an American military response remains unlikely.

August 23, 2013 10:12
2 minute read.
Syrian government officials and military personnel visit a victim of chemical weapons.

syria chemical weapons victim 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Despite pressure on US President Barack Obama to intervene in Syria following the reported large-scale chemical attack, an American military response remains unlikely, Israeli defense experts told The Jerusalem Post Thursday.

“It is not the first use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime and I doubt very much whether the US and the UN will effectively do anything this time,” said Prof. Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin- Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University.

“In the end the loser in the civil war will be the side that is more sensitive to cost,” he added.

“A chemical attack on Israel is a different story, as Israel is expected to retaliate heavily in order to restore deterrence,” Inbar added, explaining why the risk to Israel is limited.

Dr. Dan Schueftan, director of the National Security Studies Center at the University of Haifa, said, “There’s no countdown to US intervention, certainly not.”

Schueftan, who is also a visiting professor at Georgetown University, said that while he opposes many US policies in the Middle East, he supports the White House’s decision not to intervene in Syria.

“There is no one to support,” he argued. “The alternative to Assad is not a liberal regime.”

Schueftan said the available videos and photographs emerging from Syria gave him the impression that reports of a chemical attack were authentic, but added that he could not completely rule out the possibility of mass manipulation.

“If it occurred, it signifies the readiness of the Syrian regime to use these weapons,” he added, describing the development as “grave.”

From Israel’s point of view, the threat of a chemical attack is low, as the regime would only be willing to fire chemical weapons at its southern neighbor if its existence was in danger, Schueftan said.

“That’s not the case today. Their war is against the rebels, not Israel,” he said.

He recalled how Egypt used poisonous gas in Yemen in the 1960s, which at the time led to concerns that the chemical weapons would be turned against Israel.

“The main significance for Israel lies in the possibility of foreign intervention in Syria.

At the moment, I think the repercussions for Israel are limited.

But we must know that Arab regimes can be barbaric, and changes in the Arab world don’t decrease barbarism, but rather, increase it,” Schueftan said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Ir Amim
July 16, 2019
NGO exposes nonprofit Ir Amim activists for promoting incitement and hatred


Cookie Settings