Court mediates as soldier demands to be in combat

Soldier had previously suffered leukemia denied combat role by IDF because of higher health risk.

September 5, 2012 04:43
2 minute read.
IDF arrests Palestinian man in Ramallah [file]

IDF soldiers arrest a Palestinian in Ramallah 370 (R). (photo credit: Mohamad Torokman / Reuters)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The High Court of Justice on Monday brokered an informal meeting as a compromise between a soldier who demanded to serve in a fighting unit and the IDF, which has denied his request.

The soldier, Yoav Danguri- Hayat, previously suffered from leukemia, but claims he has made a full recovery. The IDF said that even so, there are unpredictable and higher health risks to Danguri-Hayat in a fighting unit that could not be ignored.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Originally, the IDF denied the soldier the option of fighting in a combat unit as a matter of general policy, without looking at his individual circumstances. Such a policy could possibly have been ruled as unconstitutional, for unreasonably violating an individual’s right to be evaluated for employment purposes based on individual circumstances, and allowing across-the-board discrimination because of a prior health condition.

However, by Monday’s hearing, the IDF had already altered its rejection of his request to serve in a fighting unit, accepting in principle that someone with a health condition could serve in combat, while rejecting his specific case as being too risky.

In an emotional appeal, the soldier told the court first through his attorney and then personally that he had “dreamed his whole life” of being in a fighting unit and that he was highly motivated.

Initially, while the court said it appreciated his sentiment, the justices said they saw no way to get involved in the case.

Courts cannot be in the business of second-guessing doctors on health issues, said Justice Edna Arbel. If an IDF medical expert has declared him too risky for combat service, even if he has several counter-experts and is currently in excellent physical condition, which Danguri-Hayat said was the case, the court had to defer to the IDF.

Danguri-Hayat’s case was even more difficult, according to the court, because he had actually been given a soughtafter intelligence position in the IDF. As a result, Danguri- Hayat could not say that the IDF was refusing to let him serve in the armed forces.

Danguri-Hayat and his attorney argued that while the IDF had said it had reviewed his medical file, in reality, it had not, and certainly had not carefully analyzed his case. In particular, they noted that the IDF, in response to his petition, had demanded that he produce his medical file, though they already had it.

In response, the justices pressured the IDF to agree to allow Danguri-Hayat an informal hearing with its senior medical authority, who had vetoed his involvement in a combat unit.

Initially, the IDF agreed to the meeting in order for Danguri- Hayat to hear from its expert directly why his request was rejected, but not for a real exchange of views.

Pressured further by the court, the IDF agreed to leave the case open so that, at least in theory, Danguri-Hayat might have a chance of convincing the IDF’s medical expert to change his opinion.

The court then ruled that its decision on the petition would be postponed pending the meeting between Danguri- Hayat and the IDF medical authority.

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night