State attorney: Gilad Sharon case lacks evidence

Moshe Lador says situation illustrates the difficulties in prosecuting corruption against public officials.

By
January 17, 2013 02:19
1 minute read.
Gilad Sharon [file photo]

Gilad Sharon (R) 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

There was not enough evidence in the bribery case against Gilad Sharon to bring about a conviction, State Attorney Moshe Lador said on Wednesday.

In a statement released by his office, Lador said that the case was also complicated due to the failure by a number of people abroad to cooperate with the investigation.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


A week ago, the state dropped the case against former prime minister Ariel Sharon’s son, which had alleged that he had brokered bribes on his father’s behalf.

This decision followed a petition submitted by Sharon to the High Court in November in which he asked the court to explain why the case had not been concluded.

The allegations were that Sharon illegally handled multimillion-dollar transfers from South African businessman Cyril Kern to his father.

Lador’s statement added that because of the senior Sharon’s physical condition it is impossible to expect him to testify, or to be questioned about the investigation’s findings, or for his son to be expected to explain or defend his past actions.

Lador’s statement ends with a passage about how this case and others like it have illustrated the difficulties facing the state in prosecuting corruption and economic crimes, including against public officials.



Lador also expresses his hope that greater measures can be taken to improve the system in order to give the state a better chance in fighting such crimes.

Related Content

Riot
August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night

By DANIEL K. EISENBUD