Israeli flag flutters over settlement of Ofra 311 R.
(photo credit: Laszlo Balogh / Reuters)
The state has promised to demolish 47 illegal structures in five different West
Bank outposts by the end of 2011, according to a document it submitted to the
High Court of Justice on Monday.
rebuffs faction’s calls to build new settlements
It issued its statement in response to a
Peace Now petition against six unauthorized outposts: Givat Assaf, Ha¹roeh,
Ramat Gilad, Mitzpe Yitzhar, Ma¹aleh Rehavam and Mitzpe Lachish.
in Likud: 19 MKs speak out against settlement freeze
those six, only one Givat Assaf, which has 30 structures is totally built on
private Palestinian land. In contrast, Mitzpe Lachish is located wholly on state
The state said the fate of Mitzpe Lachish, with its 14 structures,
and that of the other 60 structures on state land in four of the other outposts,
would be weighed in the future.
According to the state, Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu held a meeting last Monday with the defense minister, the
public security minister, the attorney-general and other relevant ministers to
formulate a policy with respect to outposts.
It was determined that the
state's general policy with regard to illegal settler construction was to remove
those homes and structures built on private Palestinian land and to look at the
option of authorizing buildings on state land. However, no timetable was given
for the implementation of this broader policy.
The state also cautioned
in its response that all steps relating to the demolition of illegal West Bank
structures had to be weighed against Israel's diplomatic concerns and
The announcement of impending demolitions of illegal structures,
many of which are populated with either families or single adults, came just
weeks after the US vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that condemned any
Israeli settlement construction as illegal.
On Monday, a source in the
Prime Minister's Office denied that there was any connection between the veto
and the state's decision to set a timetable for the demolition of outpost homes.
This is not a form of payback, the source said.
"The prime minister has
always said Israel is a country governed by the rule of law, so what was built
illegally on Palestinian land will be coming down," one official
The official added that the timing of the response was not dictated
by anything on the diplomatic calendar, such as the upcoming Quartet meeting in
Paris, but only by the court's timetable.
Peace Now, meanwhile, said it
had mixed feelings about the state's response.
Hagit Ofran of Peace Now
said she welcomed the announcement of the impending demolitions and added that
she hoped the state would issue a similar response regarding other outpost
She noted that according to Peace Now, an additional 64
outposts were partially or fully built on private Palestinian land.
group's attorney Michael Sfard noted that the setting of a timetable had
tremendous significance, but at the same time the state had not agreed to remove
the outposts completely.
The issue that drove Peace Now to petition the
court, he said, was the illegal nature of the outposts, not whether they had
been built on private or public land.
Ofran added that when the state
spoke of the possibility of authorizing illegal homes on state land, it was in
effect speaking of creating new settlements something it had pledged to the
international community that it would no longer do.
In contrast, Dani
Dayan, who heads the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the
Gaza Strip, charged that the state¹s response was an "act of provocation that
will only serve to incite and anger while serving no practical purpose in
bettering relations with our Arab neighbors." The government's choice to "to
advance policies that use bulldozers against Israeli citizens as opposed to
basic common sense should be an issue that troubles all Israelis," he
Dayan said that based on his information, 98 percent of outpost
homes were on "state land" and had been established with government
"Within five minutes and with the relevant signatures, these
areas could be legalized and we could avoid all the incitement and violence that
might result if these homes are demolished," he said.
It is possible to
address the issue of the homes on private Palestinian land through dialogue, he
"We would implore the prime minister and his government to act
sensibly and place the Israeli people¹s interests before the constantly changing
whims of the international community and a handful of Peace Now activists," he
Separately the state, in its response to the court, spoke about the
overall issue of illegal construction and demolitions in the West Bank. It noted
that it had demolished 24 percent of illegal settler construction in the West
Bank compared with 14% of Palestinian construction.Herb Keinon
contributed to this report.