Come y’all! Aliya is the solution

A different perspective: Not so long ago, Zionism was a derogatory word in Israel.

By JAY BUSHINSKY
February 9, 2012 22:45
4 minute read.
Israeli flags

Israeli flags 390. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Not so long ago, Zionism was a derogatory word in Israel.

It was used in common speech as a synonym for “nonsense.” People used to say, “Don’t talk ‘Zionism’ to me,” meaning, “Get serious!”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


That cavalier attitude, which existed in the 1950s, no longer exists. Perhaps this is because a renewal of Zionism in the original sense of the word would mean large-scale immigration of Jews to this country and preserve the current ratio of secular Jews to ultra- Orthodox haredim.

The latter oppose Zionism as a godless affront to their religious beliefs. The current consensus here is that Israel should continue to be a Jewish and democratic state. As far as the haredim are concerned, the term “Jewish” presumably could be replaced with or appended by “God-fearing,” or “Torah-oriented.”

Much more important than rhetoric and terminology, however, is the apparent fact that Israel’s survival as a state committed to Hebraic culture and values depends on the perpetuation of a heterogeneous Jewish majority composed of religious Zionists and nonreligious ones. Attainment of this objective requires a constant and substantial rate of Jewish immigration.

North America, especially the United States, is the most plausible source of such an influx. There are several theoretical reasons why it can fulfill this role.

Although the estimated six million Jews who live in the US enjoy a satisfactory standard of living, are physically secure and are politically free, they cannot overcome the impact of social assimilation.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


The current rate of intermarriage in the US is 60 percent. This has a very serious consequence from the standpoint of Jewish religious law which decrees that the offspring of mothers who are not Jewish according to the Orthodox rabbinical definition cannot be considered Jews according to Halacha (religious law).

Because of the democratic nature of American society, most Jewish children and adolescents come into close and constant contact with non-Jewish peers. By the time they become adults, they often see no reason to insist that their future husbands or wives must be Jewish. Thereafter, many of those who intermarry do not insist that their offspring be given a Jewish education.

The statistical results show that the Jewish population’s numerical growth is well below the national norm.

One of the latest symptoms of this demographic problem is the drop in enrollment in Jewish day schools. Consequently, fewer American- and Canadian- Jewish children can read, write or speak Hebrew, are familiar with Jewish history and tradition and have any cultural affinity with Israel.

Those who do come to Israel from North America as olim (immigrants) therefore do not find it easy to adjust to a country in which the Hebrew language is dominant.

Emigration from the US or Canada also runs counter to the historical character of North American society, i.e. the readiness to admit, welcome and support newcomers from all over the world, and contradicts the effort made by the emigrants’ parents to adjust to the American way of life. There can be no doubt that Jews have been among the greatest beneficiaries of the American tradition of admitting newcomers anxious to escape European anti-Semitism and become citizens of a free country in which equality is a national ideal.

The most tragic exception to the open-immigration policy occurred during the years when the Nazis held sway in Germany. Only a relatively small percentage of those who were in desperate need of refuge were admitted.

Nowadays. immigration to Israel need not be an exclusively ideological or self- sacrificing act. The late president Ezer Weizmann once remarked in a private conversation that life in Israel should become so attractive that Jews abroad would prefer its ambiance to that of the Diaspora. His concept has been achieved to a significant extent. The standard of living here is comparatively high, professional and business opportunities do exist.

The best way to enable young Jewish men and women to enjoy these benefits is by encouraging them to be proficient in the country’s national language – Hebrew – before they get here. More emphasis should be placed in the Jewish schools of North America on fluency in Hebrew. This is because the need for crash linguistic courses in ulpans after their arrival can sap the energy needed for successful integration into the country’s economic and social framework.

In short, the Jewish people cannot have it both ways. Maintenance and defense of an independent Jewish and democratic state requires an overwhelming Jewish majority.

This goal cannot be realized if half of the world’s Jewish population continues to live abroad and a significant number of native-born Israelis prefer to emigrate to the US, Canada and Australia. (Paradoxically, the official demographic statistics publicized annually in conjunction with the advent of Rosh Hashana never disclose the number of yordim who left in the preceding 12 months.) To achieve their declared objective, the various Zionist organizations here and abroad must develop effective techniques to attract Jewish immigrants to Israel.

Failure to do so will have profound demographic consequences. According to Wikipedia, Israel’s haredi ultra-Orthodox population, which is non- or anti- Zionist, doubles every 12 years because of its high birth rate. That factor alone could change Israel’s national character from secularist to religious by the middle of this century.

By the way, one of the greatest anomalies of this situation is that 40% of the haredim do not work for a living and therefore do not pay taxes. Nevertheless, their financial needs and the budgets required by their educational institutions (where mathematics, the sciences and foreign languages are not taught) are subsidized by government funds most of which are obtained from the secular taxpayers. This is one of the direst consequences of Israel’s political system in which coalition governments inevitably depend on haredi-oriented political parties for their survival.

The writer is a veteran foreign correspondent.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

November 16, 2018
Between the freedom and security of information

By NACHMAN SHAI