US President Obama with PM Netanyahu at White House 370.
(photo credit: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)
An amazing line-up of military experts, retired generals, heads of the Mossad
and the General Security Service, former heads of the National Security Council,
former defense ministers and prime ministers have all called on Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak not to attack Iran without
the full support and engagement of the United States.
backgrounds of these people, there is an inclination among some of the
right-wing MK’s and supporters of the prime minister to declare that those to
adhere to this position are leftists, traitors, quislings and anarchists. I am
not referring to those who have called on pilots to refuse their orders but
people whose military background and political record cannot be
I am also calling on the prime minister and the defense
minister not to launch an attack against Iran. I know I will be called
Chamberlain and quisling and lots of other names. I know that some of my readers
will automatically say that I am in favor of the Iranians launching a nuclear
attack against Israel. I don’t care. When the defense minister glibly talks
about 500 casualties if we Israelis behave ourselves and stay indoors, there is
good reason to question his sanity in advocating an attack.
Why not 5,000
or 50,000? Who can accurately predict how many of us will be killed by the
rainfall of rockets that may penetrate our missile defense systems? The
Iran-Iraq war lasted eight years and there were more than one million
casualties. If we launch an attack against Iran, why should we think it will be
quick and end when we want it to end?
This is, of course, set against the risk
of having to deal with an Iranian nuclear bomb. No one has said the final “red
line” set by Israel – an Iranian decision to make a bomb – has been crossed. No
one has produced absolute, firm, undeniable evidence that there is an Iranian
nuclear bomb program. The best that we have are IAEA reports that cannot certify
that there is no nuclear weapons program.
The United States presented
harder evidence than that to justify attacking Iraq without finding a single
shred of real evidence that Saddam Hussein in fact had a nuclear weapons program
prior to the Second Gulf War. I am not saying that Iran does or does not
presently have a nuclear weapons program.
They probably do have the
intention to develop a weapons program and I do not ignore or take lightly the
anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rhetoric threatening our existence. I do question
the wisdom of a lone Israeli strike against Iran.
JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:
I think an Israeli
strike against Iran would aim to raise the price of Iranian plans. The Israeli
strike would seek to create deterrence against future Iranian plans. Even if
there is no real possibility of a serious blow against the nuclear program, an
Israeli strike would probably target civilian infrastructure such as the
refineries and electricity plants with the aim of sending Iran back into the
Similar war plans prior to the Second Lebanon War did not
turn the Lebanese public against Hezbollah, as hoped, but quite the opposite,
turned Hassan Nasrallah into one of the most popular leaders in the Arab and
Islamic world. I am quite sure some of our Israeli experts around Netanyahu and
Barak are betting that an Israeli strike would empower the Iranian opposition
and give new life to the “green movement” which erupted in protests following
the 2009 presidential elections.
What if the Israeli strike achieves the
exact opposite goal? What if an Israeli strike is what gives the Iranian
ayatollahs the public legitimacy to advance the nuclear weapons program that it
likely doesn’t have today? The end result may in fact be the Iranian decision to
make their bombs and even to speed up their plans to show that despite the
Israeli attack they can still do it.
AN ISRAELI strike against Iran is
bad for Israel. It is too dangerous, too risky, has no assured results, and puts
millions of Israeli citizens at direct risk of missile attacks from our
neighbors. It will consolidate support against Israel throughout the Arab and
Islamic world, even if some of the regimes in the region would actually be
pleased with the Israeli strike, the Arab and Islamic streets around the region
would rally around the ayatollahs’ hatred of Israel. Jews and Jewish
institutions around the world would be vulnerable to Iranian led terrorism – we
have seen their capabilities already. Why take on all of these risks?
to me the best way today to prevent the impending Israeli strike is for the US
to stop beating around the bush and to put its foot down and publicly state
without any ifs, ands or buts that an Israeli strike at this time against Iran
is not acceptable.
Israel would be using US-supplied weapons and
technology, and as Israel’s most important ally by far it has a responsibility
to tell us what they really believe. The width and the depth of the US-Israel
relation goes far beyond the $3 billion of annual aid. Israel has far too much
to lose by ignoring a firm US demand. In order to make that US unequivocal
statement even more valid, President Barack Obama should also state once again
that the US will not allow Iran to achieve nuclear bomb status and to back that
statement with a firm US commitment to use force if necessary to validate that
We don’t need Obama to come to Jerusalem to convince the
people of Israel of his good intentions. We do need President Obama to say to
us: “calm down, we will not leave Israel alone and we will not tolerate an
Iranian nuclear bomb.” For the sake of Israel, we need our American friends to
stop us before it is too late.The writer is the co-chairman of IPCRI,
the Israel Palestine Center for Research and Information, a columnist for
Jerusalem Post, a radio host on All for Peace Radio and the initiator and
negotiator of the secret back channel for the release of Gilad Schalit.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>