Letters to the Editor: January 13, 2016

Dead terrorists have lost any entitlement to a normal burial.

By
January 12, 2016 21:42
Letters

Letters. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Still vulnerable

With regard to “Erdan delays releasing body of Tel Aviv shooter Milhem” (January 11), if we don’t want funerals turned into terrorist-supporting events, we do not release bodies.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Dead terrorists have lost any entitlement to a normal burial.

When Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Gaza praised the terrorist Nashat Milhem and said he had “shamed the Zionists and caused hysteria,” was he wrong? I think not.

We sought help from the Palestinian Authority in searching for Milhem. You know you have reached rock bottom when you call out to your enemy for help.

From the first moment we gave up Jewish land to our enemies, we lost our independence and ability to enter parts of our land, enabling terrorism to thrive.

Nevertheless, we apparently can rest easy. According to your January 1 article “Ya’alon: Our enemies know we’ll strike back hard – from the air, sea or land,” our country, according to Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, “has advanced air capabilities to send its aircraft anywhere, and hit ‘those who constantly seek our harm, and to disrupt the lives of Israeli residents....”



So why are we still being harmed and having our lives disrupted? We have never been more vulnerable and unprotected!

EDITH OGNALL
Netanya

Matter of fear

In “Israeli Arabs and our moral compass” (Comment & Features, January 11), Dov Lipman draws patently wrong conclusions.

Rabbi Lipman notes two recent incidents. In one, Israeli passengers on an Aegean Airlines flight to Israel demanded that Israeli Arabs be removed from the aircraft. In another, passengers on a Tel Aviv-bound bus demanded that an elderly Arab man who was mumbling in Arabic be removed from the vehicle.

What both these incidents manifest is not a loss of moral compass. Rather, they reflect our paralytic fear in the face of unceasing terror.

We know right from wrong.

We have taught the world to appreciate the difference. Yet my immediate concerns center on my mother-in-law, a survivor of Majdanek, who panics at the mere thought of venturing out of our home for fear of repeated victimization, and on my daughter, who had to “take the chance” and go to grad school in Herzliya the other day, dreading the news of a terrorist suspect reported on the loose.

It is the culture of hate and the scourge of anti-Semitism and all its offshoots, from PA incitement and its western complicity and enablement, to B’Tselem, Breaking the Silence and BDS, which make a mockery of meaning and morals.

Our moral compass is set right. Very much so. It is a matter of fear, plain and simple.

ELY J. ROSENZVEIG
Beit Shemesh

Rough, gruff, tough

I am glad that the Washington director of Agudath Israel has received official recognition for his efforts to ease the path of Orthodox Jews passing through American security checks (“Rabbi gets US Homeland Security award for airport screening aid,” January 11).

It is not only in the US where there is an issue. The same problem is endemic at Asian airports, where security staff members have not been briefed about the cultural mores of Jewish passengers.

One instance is an officious person at Beijing Airport insisting on her right to open up my tefillin, and my insistence that these were religious objects not to be broken apart. Another is the number of times my wife and I have had security people wanting to remove my kippa and her hat, not to speak of their suspicion of other religious appurtenances in our hand luggage, including packaged kosher food.

Unfortunately, many airport security personnel in Asia cannot speak or understand English, and even if they do, they only know enough to be rough, gruff and tough.

RAYMOND APPLE
Jerusalem

The writer is emeritus rabbi of the Great Synagogue in Sydney.

Bashing Deri

I totally disagree with your January 11 editorial “Deri’s return.” It is the highlight of your constant Deri bashing.

You ask rhetorically how many of us would trust a convicted felon. Well, why should we trust anyone in politics? Is a politician more trustworthy because he or she has never been found guilty in a court of law? Deri has done his time. Leave him alone. If he stays clean and serves the country, he’ll have done better than many others who never tripped up. Good for him and good for us. If not, he’ll go to jail again. What’s the problem? To divide mankind into two kinds – the good ones and the bad ones – is un-Jewish.

We all have good and not-sogood sides. Our primary fight is not against the bad ones, but first of all against our own evil inclinations. This does not get any easier by pointing fingers and pretending that we ourselves are of a higher quality.

MOSHE-MORDECHAI VAN ZUIDEN
Jerusalem

He wants to help

I am writing to support Barry’s Shaw’s contention that a privately funded coordinating organization is necessary to promote Israel’s PR around the world, particularly against the organized BDS network (“Advocacy toward a better future,” Original Thinking, January 10).

Back in the 1980s, when I was chairman of the Israel and Middle East Committee of the Jewish Community Council of Greater Washington, I saw the need for pro-Israel pamphlets on campuses.

I proposed that the JCC support such outreach. It refused; it did not want to be doing Israel’s job. So I approached the Israeli Embassy.

But it, too, demurred, saying it did not want to be seen to be influencing opinion on American campuses.

Eventually, I was helped to find suitable sponsors. In fact, some 50,000 copies of two pamphlets – “Israel: The Facts” and “The USA and Israel: A Comparison of Two Allies” – were distributed.

At that time, I suggested to the embassy that it establish an Israeli PR center in Washington. It once again demurred. But officials told me that such a center had been established by the embassy in London, and provided me with access when I next visited the UK.

There I discovered that the center was on the top floor, actually in the attic of the embassy in Kensington Palace Green. This was a “public relations center” with no public access. When I pointed out the futility, embassy staffers were not amused. I asked where their material came from and was told Jerusalem.

In Jerusalem, I visited the company producing the materials.

When I asked how to go about producing such pamphlets, they laughed and explained that nothing could be done without the prior approval of not only the Foreign Ministry, but also the Prime Minister’s Office, since everything published had to conform to current government policies.

In other words, it was an impossible task. There was no ability to respond quickly to media lies about Israel. My conclusion was that it would never work, and I gave up.

Maybe now is a better time, given the success of the mounting campaign of delegitimization against Israel – which the government is clearly incapable of responding to.

JACK S. COHEN
Netanya

She objects

We are all settlers. We settled this land, and I object to the way The Jerusalem Post uses the word. The latest instance is in “Gush Etzion’s boundaries expanded to include new Jewish tourist center” (January 7).

JESSICA FISCHER
Michmoret

Related Content

TRAVELERS WAIT in line at Ben-Gurion International Airport. Let critics come to Israel and see this
August 17, 2018
Editor's Notes: Politics at our borders

By YAAKOV KATZ