December 28: Inaccurate piece

The basic message of this article is to create a rabbinate that does not coerce Jewish law. The results of this approach can be found in the tragic rates of intermarriage all over the world compared to the much lower rate here in Israel.

By JERUSALEM POST READERS
December 27, 2012 23:33
3 minute read.
Letters

Letters 370. (photo credit: REUTERS/Handout )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Inaccurate piece

Sir, – I would like to cite various inaccuracies in “Whither the Chief Rabbinate?” (Comment & Features, December 26).

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


1. There has been no change concerning marriage, divorce and conversion since the establishment of the Chief Rabbinate. Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook never allowed halachic changes and was probably the most haredi of all the country’s chief rabbis.

2. The article mentions that “some Ashkenazi incumbents have been non-Zionist rabbis, who attached little, if any, transcendental meaning or purpose to a Jewish state.”

There are two: former chief rabbi Meir Israel Lau – the epitome of a rabbi the world over – and the incumbent, Yona Metzger, a graduate of the first hesder yeshiva, Kerem B’Yavne.

3. As chief rabbi of Dimona for over 30 years I have allowed women to speak at funerals. A few years ago we were given written instructions by the Chief Rabbinate to allow this.

4. The writers mention “corruption in the kashrut industry.” This is an absolutely untrue statement. If the writers know of corruption, then surely the police should be informed.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


5. I hate to disappoint many people, but the next chief rabbi, whether from Tzohar or not, will not change halachic standards.

The basic message of this article is to create a rabbinate that does not coerce Jewish law. The results of this approach can be found in the tragic rates of intermarriage all over the world compared to the much lower rate here in Israel.

As Dr. Ismar Schorsch said about the chief rabbinate, this approach has “not a scintilla of moral worth.”

YITZCHOK ELEFANT
Dimona
The writer is chief rabbi of Dimona


Tough already

Sir, – Regarding “Guns, homicide and the current debate in the US” (Think About It, December 25), there has been much discussion about school security, with some National Rifle Association supporters calling for the training of teachers to use guns to increase security in all American schools.

What I have not seen is the response of major American teachers’ unions to this proposal. Has anyone asked teachers if they want to be trained to shoot intruders in their schools? Will teachers be required to accept gun training as part of their qualification? As a teacher I think we have enough responsibilities without becoming marksmen. Entrance intercoms, bullet-proof windows, closed-circuit TV, policemen on the beat and emergency buttons that alert the police are reasonable.

Arming teachers is less reasonable.

JOSEPH FELD
London


Lack of interest

Sir, – With regard to the letter “Egotistical snobs” (December 25), which complains that English-language election debates in Haifa and Beersheba had been canceled “due to the lack of sufficient participation of political parties,” the Association of Americans and Canadians in Israel (AACI) is appalled that the major parties appear to be ignoring the concerns of the periphery – which has a significant number of English-speaking citizens.

In preparation for the upcoming election, AACI, in conjunction with The Jerusalem Post, had planned to host forums in English around the country where the major political parties could voice their platforms and answer questions. Only one month before the election, we were notified that the forums planned for Haifa and Beersheba would need to be canceled.

Do English-speaking citizens need to travel to the center of the country to find out the truth, or is it already apparent by the political parties’ lack of interest?

ASA COHEN
Jerusalem
The writer is national president of AACI

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

US student Lara Alqasem appears at the district court in Tel Aviv, 2018
October 21, 2018
Reality Check: A deserved defeat for the Thought Police

By JEFF BARAK