Not radical Islamists, but ‘Islamic infidels’

I am a proud Republican, but after 40 years in the Middle East, I am convinced that playing the “radical Islam card” only benefits the jihadists.

January 3, 2016 20:42
US Republicans

Republican candidates (L-R) Governor John Kasich, former HP CEO Carly Fiorina, Senator Marco Rubio, Dr. Ben Carson, businessman Donald Trump, Senator Ted Cruz, former Governor Jeb Bush, Governor Chris Christie and Senator Rand Paul pose before the start of the Republican presidential debate. (photo credit: JPOST STAFF,REUTERS)

No Republican presidential candidate debate would be complete without a lecture on radical Islam. The narrative is that if you are a liberal, an Obama or Hillary lover, you will not utter the phrase “radical Islam.” It implies that America should be at war with radical Islam.

I am a proud Republican, but after 40 years in the Middle East, I am convinced that playing the “radical Islam card” only benefits the jihadists. “Radical” to the Muslim world means “Salafi.” “Salafi” (Arabic for ancestor) and “Islam” (submission) provide the entire basis for the Islamic religion and for Sharia law.

Saudi Arabia is the fertile ground in which radical Islam and Islamic State (IS) grow. The kingdom relies on its alliance with radical Islamic clergy which produce, legitimize and defend Salafism. The West shakes the hand of one while waging war with the other. Ninety- nine percent of all suicide bombers are Salafist Muslims. Salafism is the purest form of radical religion. Radical means fundamental and goes to the root of Salafism.

To declare war on radical Islam is to declare war on all Islam, since 60 percent of all Muslims are fundamentalist, radical Salafists – no less than 750 million Muslims. It’s exactly what jihadists want. It is much wiser to define all jihadists as “Islamic infidels” and control the terms of the ideological war. ISIS should be called ISI – Islamic State Infidels.

If the US is going to wage war against radical Islam, we need to go to war against Turkey, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and a dozen other countries.

If we really believed that, then why did we go to war to save Kuwait, a radical Islamic Salafist state? Or fight one of America’s longest wars, in Iraq, another radical Islamic state? That is simply not possible.

The US knows how to defeat ISIS, but it will require the same search strategy that was utilized to defeat al-Qaida. The problem now is that we do not have the support of the American people or the Sunni tribesmen. The corrupt Iraqi Shi’ite, pro-Iran government was the virus from which ISIS sprang and grew.

After the war in Iraq, there is no desire to go back into Iraq and sacrifice more American lives. The total number of US troops killed in combat in Iraq was 4,487, with 32,223 wounded, and IS knows it. How, then, does the US defeat ISIS? America must fight an ideological war. Ideological warfare is ground zero in defeating ISIS. In order for ISIS to grow it needs a war with the “Great Satan,” America, and the “Small Satan,” Israel.

Traditional warfare is like killing flies: We kill one and rejoice; they kill one, and 100 come to the funeral. The traditional wars of the twentieth century are obsolete. Twenty-first century wars are ideological, economic, media-driven proxy wars. Unless or until America wins the ideological war the cancer will continue to mutate.

I asked the late prime minister Ariel Sharon to tell me how many Arab Christians blew themselves up attempting to kill Jews. His response was, “None; why?” I made that point because not all Arabs want to blow themselves up; the vast majority of Muslims are not jihadists. Yes, they may be radical, but they don’t want to blow themselves up. In the Muslim world, calling someone honorable is the highest compliment and humiliation is worse than death.

Do we really want to declare war on radical Islam and 750 million Muslims? Do we really think we can humiliate them into submission? It will not be possible to defeat radical Islam as long as we are at war with radical Islamists, and if we paint the target with such a broad brush. Jihadist organizations pay nothing for advertisements.

Why must a terrorist’s name be acknowledged? Why not simply place an “X” or label them “she” or “he” instead of using a name? Why must a terrorist even be acknowledged as a radical Islamic jihadist? Would it motivate them if the last words used to describe them were “Islamic infidels?” If the jihadists are at war with the infidels, do you think they want to be labeled as one, as well? “If it bleeds, it leads,” is the motto of big business media worldwide. A jihadist should not be lionized; he must be demonized.

Refusing to acknowledge who they are, but only calling the individual an “Islamic infidel” accomplishes that objective.

Since 9/11, America has focused on who kills us, but not on why they kill. The answer is always the same: They believe we are infidels.

We must play the Islamic infidel card on them, and we must persuade the Muslim world to join us, especially since the majority of those whom jihadists kill are Muslim.

He who defines the terms controls the debate. How about taking a few billion dollars we use on bombs and blanket the Internet with an “Islamic infidel” campaign? Secondly, the US must employ Israel as a strategic proxy. Israel helped America win the Cold War in the Middle East without the US sacrificing lives. Israel can assist the US with defeating ISIS, and we need Israel to do just that. Israel cannot be of assistance if she is weakened. America needs to move its embassy to Jerusalem and stop negotiating with Palestinian terrorists.

Jurgen Todenhofer, a former member of the German parliament, spent time with IS fighters behind enemy lines. He related to the Jewish News that “The only country [IS] fears is Israel. They told me they know the Israeli army is too strong for them... they know the Israelis are very tough as far as fighting against guerrillas and terrorists.... They are not scared of the British and the Americans, they are scared of the Israelis... the Israeli army is the real danger.... These people [the IDF] can fight a guerrilla war.”

Thirdly, the US must fight a special ops war. You cannot bomb IS into hell, especially since it is able to use the bombing videos of civilians being killed to recruit 10 times more jihadists than are killed. In an Islamic Netflix business, America is perceived as a Goliath to their David. We must not allow that perception to take root.

Al-Qaida mutated into ISIS. It, too, will mutate into another terrorist regime if the virus is not destroyed.

Fourthly, Islamic infidels must be bankrupted.

When the Islamic state of Iran receives $150 billion compliments of the US, this nation is not serious about defeating Islamic infidels. Now, Turkey and even Jordan are buying IS oil.

ISIS will not go away any time soon. It can be defeated, but not without an ideological war that demonizes ISIS and all jihadists as Islamic infidels.

The writer is the author of The Columbus Code, his latest novel. It is available online and at booksellers.

Related Content

US NAVY F/A-18E Super Hornets conduct a fly-by of South Dakota’s Mount Rushmore in 2006
October 23, 2019
Book review: When unremarkable is remarkable


Cookie Settings