Friends don’t let friends violate democracy

It is precisely because Israel has a reputation as a vibrant democracy that our friends abroad are dismayed; the Israel they know doesn’t do this sort of thing.

By RACHEL LIEL
December 18, 2011 21:52
3 minute read.
A Jewish woman wears a Burka in Jerusalem.

Jewish woman burka 311. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Instead of bridling at Western criticism over the anti-democratic wave that’s rising in Israel, we should take the concern as an indirect compliment – and as sound advice. It is precisely because Israel has a reputation as a vibrant democracy that our friends abroad are dismayed; the Israel they know doesn’t do this sort of thing.

Israeli soldiers aren’t supposed to walk out of ceremonies – with the encouragement of their spiritual leaders – when women dare to sing; that sort of thing happens in Iran.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Israeli women aren’t supposed to be ordered to sit in the back of the bus; that sort of thing went out of fashion in the 1950s with Rosa Parks and the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott.

The points made earlier this month by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at a closed session of the Saban Forum in Washington - Israel shouldn’t be passing laws aimed at drying up the funds of peace and human rights organizations, because that is another thing democracies don’t do infuriated some of the Knesset members who stand behind the proposed legislation.

“Who is Hillary Clinton to preach to us?” said some of the MKs. “She’s exaggerating.”

The fact is, however, that Clinton didn’t say anything that Israelis from every sector of society haven’t been saying with increasing heat and volume in recent weeks and months. The secretary of state has taken her cue from Israeli politicians in the opposition and government, from the Israeli media, from an array of Israeli public figures and from the growing “buzz” among the Israeli public over the shocking, reactionary phenomena we’re witnessing. The buzz has carried beyond Israel’s borders.

WE MUST always keep in mind that these words of reproach from abroad are not coming from our enemies, but from our friends. Dan Shapiro, US ambassador to Israel, reportedly told the Prime Minister’s Office that the new bill to heavily tax foreign donations to local NGOs would affect US-funded groups that teach English, promote Jewish-Arab coexistence, and seek to empower Beduin women. German Ambassador Andreas Michaelis told Jerusalem officials that the bill would play into the hands of European elements hostile to Israel.



Can’t the promoters of this law – as well as other legislation aimed at silencing unpopular voices – understand that such candid counsel is offered in a spirit of friendship? Will they also dismiss the warnings from American Jews like Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, who wrote that laws stifling free expression, judicial independence and minority rights hurt Israel “internally” and “externally”? Foxman also wrote that these laws would mean “the very democratic character of the state is being eroded.”

Or how about the advice of Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus, who, in an article dedicated to the widening exclusion of women from the Israeli public sphere, wrote: “American taxpayers, and American Jews in particular, will not tolerate Jerusalem as Riyadh-lite”? Will they also wave her off? Again, though, these voices from afar are taking their lead from voices right here – and these local voices haven’t come only from the “Left.” They’ve come from the very heart of the Israeli establishment. As early as the beginning of May, the professional staff of the Foreign Ministry issued a position paper against a previous version of the anti-NGO law, declaring that “adoption of this bill is expected to do severe damage to Israel’s international interests.” Such a law would damage Israel’s image and essence as a democracy, and would bring Israel in for sharp criticism from Europe and the US, the ministry staff warned.

The politicians behind the sort of chilling legislation we’ve seen of late didn’t listen to the Foreign Ministry professionals then, and they haven’t listened to the opposition to these laws that has erupted during the current Knesset session. Now the exact same arguments are being raised by Jews and friends of Israel overseas – and still the reactionaries blame the messenger.

Well, the messengers are everywhere now, and they’re all saying the same thing. So Hillary Clinton is not the problem, and neither is Dan Shapiro, Abraham Foxman, Dan Meridor, Bennie Begin or Dorit Beinisch.

The problem, rather, is the assault on democracy that has been launched against this country by local enforcers who think of themselves as patriots and pious Jews.

The writer is the executive director of the New Israel Fund.

Related Content

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin shake hands they meet in Helsinki
July 18, 2018
Spinning the summit between Trump and Putin

By MIKE EVANS