Greek parliament 311.
(photo credit: REuters)
Last week, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou announced he would hold a
national referendum on the Eurozone’s harsh conditions for bailing Greece out of
its financial crisis.
The harsh conditions attached by leaders of the
Eurozone for getting the banks to erase half the Greek debt, while immediately
handing over another 8 billion euro to the Greek government will affect the
Greek economy and the welfare of Greek citizens for years to come. Therefore,
it’s not unreasonable that they be asked to express their approval or rejection
of the deal.
However, it was also very dangerous, as rejecting the deal
would have had consequences for the world economy so horrendous that not even
financial experts are able to start evaluating them.
Less than two days
after announcing the referendum, Papandreou cancelled the idea – largely as a
result of the very strong pressure exerted by Eurozone leaders. However, it is
quite likely Papandreou never intended to hold a referendum in the first place.
His announcement could have been merely a tactical move designed to confront
counter violent public disapproval of his government’s treatment of the
financial crisis, and to deal with the immediate danger of his government being
brought down in a vote of no-confidence in the Greek parliament.
the motive, Papandreou’s move seems to have worked – at least temporarily. His
government survived the no-confidence vote held on Saturday morning, and the
leaders of the Eurozone, together with stock markets all over the world, heaved
a sigh of relief.
Now Papandreou is hoping to form an interim national
unity government that will have the power and moral authority to take the
decisions that must be taken, and implement the policies from which there is no
In any case, Papandreou’s actions were nothing less than
brinkmanship, a high risk game that may easily end in
JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:
Brinkmanship is also what Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and
Defense Minister Ehud Barak are currently engaged in with regard to the Iranian
issue. Netanyahu and Barak are actively involved in a world-wide media campaign
designed to give the impression that Israel is about to attack Iranian nuclear
installations, before they become operational for military purposes.
is no secret that the IDF and various intelligence services strongly object to a
unilateral Israel attack on the installations, as do many of the most hawkish
MKs – including Moshe Ya’alon and Avigdor Lieberman.
Therefore, the only
explanation is that Netanyahu and Barak are trying to scare the Iranians on the
one hand, and push the international community into effective economic sanctions
against Iran, and possibly also some form of military action if economic
Since it is doubtful that Netanyahu and Barak are
seriously contemplating an attack on Iran, which could lead to a regional
conflagration involving a war on several fronts, and thousands of rockets
falling in populated areas, the likelihood that they will decide to hold a
referendum on the issue to bypass the opposition is nil, even though a recent
public opinion poll indicated that at least 42 percent of the Israeli public
favor an attack in Iran.
In fact, referenda, as a form of direct
democracy, are not part of the Israeli system of government, In November 2010
the Knesset passed a law stating that in the event of Israel signing an
agreement with one of its neighbors involving the surrender of territories which
it currently controls, if less than 80 of the 120 Knesset Members vote to
approve the agreement a national referendum will also be required. Currently,
referenda cannot legally be held in Israel on any other issue, though every once
in a while MKs from various parties raise the idea.
differences between the Greek and Israeli situations, the use of brinkmanship by
the leaders of both countries as a tactical means for achieving goals that are
not clearly defined is dangerous in both cases.
The problem with
brinkmanship is that even the slightest miscalculation can end in total
pandemonium. In the case of Greece the danger is economic collapse and anarchy.
In the case of Israel the danger is that Iran will react irrationally, and then
God save us all.The writer is a member of the Labor Party and is
currently engaged in research and lecturing on the Knesset.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>