Who benefits from the 'break Iran apart' narrative? - opinion
Why the idea of dividing Iran serves propaganda more than geopolitical reality.
Why the idea of dividing Iran serves propaganda more than geopolitical reality.
Trump and Netanyahu may unintentionally act in line with the UN’s Responsibility to Protect principle.
The so-called “rules-based international order” has ignored the fact that an international armed conflict has long existed between Iran, the US, and Israel.
Again and again, the pattern returns: a decree of destruction, a sudden fall, a people still standing.
Jerusalem residents faced a Shabbat like no other amid incoming missiles from Iran.
The new order is colder: dependency pricing. Cut the cheap oxygen – oil cash, sanctions-evasion routes, and unprotected chokepoints – and the regimes that live on it don’t just wobble: they suffocate
Before 1979, Iran and Israel traded openly, there were flights between the countries, and they cooperated on security, agriculture, and oil.
Stuck in New York and missing Purim in Israel, unexpected hope was found in resilient Israelis, brave Iranians, and young Americans on a college campus.
After Netanyahu and Trump struck Iran, Tucker Carlson claimed that a demonic spirit had been unleashed. He is 100% correct, but he is that demonic spirit.
The antiwar front’s non-Western flank is joined by a sizable Western opposition to the war on both sides of the Atlantic.
As long the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran remains intact, it will not be over, even without Khamenei and his closest circle.