Time to return to the good old days

The National Academy of Sciences has said drug companies “spend substantially more on marketing and administration than on research and development.”

By
June 6, 2018 21:30
Time to return to the good old days

. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)

The true obscenity in 2018 America isn’t Rosanne Barr’s racist tweet or Samantha Bee’s vulgar term to describe Ivanka Trump, which her father has used repeatedly to describe other women. Nor is it Donald Trump himself boasting on the infamous Access Hollywood tape about grabbing women by their genitalia, or Tennessee Rep. Diane Black blaming school shootings on pornography.

These may all be offensive, obscene and disgusting. But they are no match for the billion-dollar campaign by drug companies to create unnecessary and dangerous demand for drugs consumers know nothing about, pressuring – and bribing – physicians to prescribe them, and enlisting the complicity of a supine Congress and administration.

The industry claims prices are so high because of its enormous investment in research and development – for which they’ve been rewarded with 17-year monopolies (patents) to charge any price they want. But the truth is, they spend billions more on advertising, promotion and lobbying to keep prices and profits high.

The National Academy of Sciences has said drug companies “spend substantially more on marketing and administration than on research and development.”

The American Medical Association, which wants drug advertising banned, said Big Pharma (a common expression) spent $6 billion last year alone on three-quarters of a million ads aimed at consumers, according to Kantar Media. That drives up prices and “inflates demand for new and more expensive drugs, even when these drugs may not be appropriate,” Kantar noted.

Price-gouging is politically protected. What politician wants to investigate big contributors, especially when one of them, Mylan CEO Heather Bresch, is the daughter of a colleague, Sen. Joe Manachin (D-WV)? When Mylan nearly tripled the price of EpiPen, the emergency injector for severe, sometimes life-threatening, allergic reactions to over $600 for a two-pack, the outrage on Capitol Hill was short-lived. Bresch explained the price hike was intended “to show the system is broken.” 

SHE’S GOT that right. But she’s only making the problem worse along with people like “Pharma Bro” Martin Shkreli, former head of Turing Pharmaceuticals. He raised the price of Daraprim, which treats serious parasitic infection – often of the body, brain or eye – by 5,000% to $750 per pill. Why? Because he could, he gloated.

You can bet Big Pharma will be spending millions this year to defeat Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), who introduced legislation to remove tax deductions for the billions the industry is spending on marketing. But there’s no need to worry – Republicans are blocking the legislation.

That may be one reason Big Pharma and its friends donate more to Republicans than Democrats, but not by much. (Thirteen of top 20 recipients of $14-plus million in drug money so far in the 2018 election cycle are Republicans, according to Opensecrets.org, and the industry has spent $84.7 million on lobbying so far this year.) Congress once more shows it is more responsive to its donors than its constituents. 

Drug-makers have a good friend in the White House, too. Companies like Pfizer gave $1.5 billion to Trump’s inaugural committee, Statnews.com reported. And the man the president picked to be his Health and Human Services secretary is Alex Azar, whose previous job had been president of pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly.

Polls show a majority of ordinary Americans, doctors, academics and global healthcare authorities oppose direct-to-consumer drug ads, according to the Los Angeles Times. But that is apparently outweighed by the big bucks Big Pharma puts into their campaign coffers.

Drug ads are usually 30-60 seconds in length, most commonly on news broadcasts, where the demographic is usually older. Advertisers are required to list major risks – my favorite is “may cause death” – telling little or nothing about cost, usage requirements, long-term treatment, and other information – just off-hand advice to “check with your doctor.” The warnings are spoken softly at supersonic speed.

DOCTORS ARE a lucrative target for Big Pharma and much is spent on persuading them to prescribe the latest miracle cure.  

Mother Jones magazine reported that Big Pharma sales tactics include more than visits by salesmen and include taking doctors to strip clubs, shooting ranges and fancy dinners, paying kickbacks for more prescriptions, providing sex partners and paying for speaking engagements at seminars that may be poorly attended, if at all.

Trump was right when he said, “The drug lobby is making an absolute fortune at the expense of American consumers.” Unfortunately, he’s part of the problem, not the solution. He opposes authorizing Medicare to negotiate directly with drug companies to lower prices, which would save consumers millions.

Health care is a high priority for most Jewish voters – some even rank it above Israel on their political agenda. We are an aging population with a high proportion of Medicare users, with nearly 20% seniors, almost double that of the general population.  Drug prices, availability and insurance are thus critical issues for many Jews.

There’s no way ads can give consumers in less than 60 superficial seconds a fraction of the information they need – and should be getting not from television but from their doctors, who know them and understand the problem better.

The ads put inordinate pressure on doctors to prescribe medications they may not feel confident with but don’t want patients going elsewhere or accusing them of not providing necessary treatment.

Commercials also can mislead consumers into thinking they have diseases they don’t in fact have – ask any med student; they seem to come down with symptoms of many of the ailments they study – and they often seek cures that they don’t need and can’t afford.

All too often, ads can create demand for a treatment for a condition that doesn’t exist or a drug of no benefit to that patient, warns Dr. John Henning Schumann of the University of Oklahoma.
The opioid crisis is driven in large part by aggressive, and often deceptive, marketing by manufacturers and by doctors easily pressured into over-prescribing for patients complaining of excessive pain. 

The FDA began permitting pharmaceutical advertising on television in 1997 – New Zealand is the only other country that permits it. Until then, ads focused on over-the-counter treatments for acid indigestion, tired blood and the heartbreak of psoriasis.

It’s time to return to those good old days.

We already outlaw cigarette advertising on television, now is the time to ban another dangerous threat to the nation’s health: drug advertising.

The writer is a syndicated columnist, Washington lobbyist and consultant. He can be reached at: dmbloomfield@comcast.net.


Related Content

U.S. Reps Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) hold a news conference after Democrats in the U
August 17, 2019
Confronting Democrats

By JPOST EDITORIAL

Cookie Settings