Reps slam Supreme Court position of Holocaust-era artwork restitution

The representatives argue that Wall's position on the case, Republic of Germany vs. Alan Philip, fails to incorporate "bipartisan Congressional action and understanding of the Holocaust."

A woman walks past artworks at the exhibition "Gurlitt: Status Report. An Art Dealer in Nazi Germany" during a media preview at Martin-Gropius Bau in Berlin, Germany, September 13, 2018

(photo credit: REUTERS/FABRIZIO BENSCH)

ByJERUSALEM POST STAFF

OCTOBER 26, 2020 14:46

Reps slam Supreme Court position of Holocaust-era artwork restitution

The representatives argue that Wall's position on the case, Republic of Germany vs. Alan Philip, fails to incorporate "bipartisan Congressional action and understanding of the Holocaust."

Vance disputes concerns over antisemitism on right

Senate advances Yehuda Kaploun as new US antisemitism envoy

Reps slam Supreme Court position of Holocaust-era artwork restitution

The representatives argue that Wall's position on the case, Republic of Germany vs. Alan Philip, fails to incorporate "bipartisan Congressional action and understanding of the Holocaust."

See more on