Israeli envoy to US distances from Danon after Kerry slight

"Danon's views of Secretary Kerry do not reflect the views of the Government of Israel," says Ron Dermer.

Ron Dermer 370 (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)
Ron Dermer 370
(photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)
WASHINGTON – Ambassador to Washington Ron Dermer distanced himself from Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon on Thursday, speaking for the Israeli government in defense of US Secretary of State John Kerry after Danon lashed out at him in the press.
“Danon’s views of Secretary Kerry do not reflect the views of the government of Israel,” Dermer said in the statement, released by the embassy.
In an article featured in Politico this week titled “We will not be threatened,” Danon says that throughout nine months of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, Kerry had repeatedly made several troubling statements about the Jewish state.
Danon proceeds to list some of them: raising the specter of a third intifada, an emboldened boycott and divestment movement, and the use of the term “apartheid” to describe a potential future political reality, should peace with the Palestinians fail to come to pass.
“Secretary Kerry’s erroneous declarations have come dangerously close to suggesting moral equivalency between Israel and its adversaries,” Danon wrote, adding that when pressed on why negotiations were important, “the secretary failed to detail what the fruits of a real peace might be for the Israeli people.”
Dermer responded with a prepared statement, rare from his office since he assumed his position in Washington in the late summer of last year.
“We do not believe that Secretary Kerry has tried to threaten Israel, and we believe that his decades of support for Israel reflect an abiding commitment to Israel’s security and its future,” the statement read.
Meanwhile, Kerry said on Thursday he would pause and reassess what might be possible after failing to meet his April 29 goal for an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal, saying both sides still wanted to try to negotiate.
“It’s time for a pause. But it’s also time to be reflective about the ways in which one might be able to find common ground even out of these difficulties,” Kerry said.
In his first public comments since the deadline passed, Kerry appeared to push back against descriptions of his talks as fruitless, saying important progress was made during the nine-month effort.
“Both parties still indicate that they feel it’s important to negotiate and want to find a way to negotiate,” Kerry said during a trip to Ethiopia. “So we believe the best thing to do right now is pause, take a hard look at these things and find out what is possible and what is not possible in the days ahead.”
The failure to reach a deal has given more ammunition to critics of President Barack Obama’s foreign policy, who also accuse him of not reacting forcefully enough to Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.
But Kerry, who has invested much of his own time and clout in the Israeli-Palestinian peace effort, strongly suggested he was not about to walk away.
“I personally remain convinced that as each [side] sort of works through the reasons that things began to become more difficult in the final hours, there may be quiet ways within which to begin to work on next steps,” Kerry said.
Israel suspended the talks a week ago, even before the deadline passed, in response to a reconciliation pact between Fatah and Hamas.
But before that, Kerry said, “both leaders took serious steps in order to engage in this discussion.
“What has not been laid out publicly and what I will do at some appropriate moment of time is make clear to everybody the progress that was made,” Kerry said. “These eight months – eight months plus – were not without significant progress in certain areas. And I don’t think anybody wants to lose that progress.”