Yochanan Danino 370.
(photo credit:Marc Israel Sellem/The Jerusalem Post)
Police Insp.-Gen. Yohanan Danino has finally given voice to the obvious. He
argued openly for legal limits to how long the police can carry on an
investigation without ever producing actual charges. It’s “clearly
unreasonable,” he intoned, for an investigation to drag on over a decade with no
It is likely Danino referred to the attorney-general’s
pending decision on whether to indict Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman on a
series of offenses including money-laundering, fraud and breach of trust.
Speaking at a different forum several days later, State Attorney Moshe Lador
expressed similar sentiments.
Such input is important, especially as it
comes from the highest police and prosecution echelons.
exist regarding how long Liberman has been under investigation. According to
some, the police had already targeted him once he quit his post as director-
general of the Prime Minister’s Office in 1997. He then established two trading
companies, one based in Cyprus.
Another version claims that the police
trained its sights on Liberman only in 1999. The most minimal estimate, the one
the police proffers, is that it was on Liberman’s tail just since
Regardless of which account we subscribe to, there’s no denying
that this is an inordinately lengthy probe.
We have no way of judging
Liberman and no intention of weighing in on his culpability one way or the
other. Yet every citizen should be alarmed by the spectacle of a police project
of exceptionally excessive duration, directed doggedly at one given individual,
though with mutating accusations against him.
Big guns were aimed at
Liberman for supposed infractions of campaign financing regulations by his party
Yisrael Beytenu. That case eventually evaporated but the investigators changed
tack and began looking for other offenses. For a time bribery charges hung over
Liberman’s head but these too vanished. That’s when investigators homed in on
companies that are no longer under Liberman’s name but which the police maintain
he owns and operates clandestinely.
Too close for comfort, the above
resemble fishing expeditions, undertaken in the hope of netting a catch.
Moreover, unseemly methods were employed over the years in the course of this
It isn’t just our say-so. Already back in 2003, then-attorney-
general Elyakim Rubinstein, now a Supreme Court justice, published a scathing
report exposing police misconduct.
Rubinstein recommended removing head
of the police investigations unit Moshe Mizrahi from his post.
Mizrahi brazenly extended permissions he obtained to bug politicians’ phones and
illicitly eavesdropped on their conversations and on those of any member of
their family, including children.
Mizrahi, who just ran in the Labor
party Knesset primary, was further accused of transcribing those conversations,
along with other material, and hoarding everything for undisclosed future use –
including what by no stretch of the imagination had anything to do with the
investigation purportedly in progress. Mizrahi’s foremost victim was Liberman
but he wasn’t alone, something which should send additional shivers down all
Rubinstein said that his findings made his “hair stand on
end”: 70% of what Mizrahi had transcribed of Liberman’s conversations was wholly
irrelevant to what he was ostensibly investigating. Rubinstein described himself
as “sickened to see the nature of the material” Mizrahi saw fit to keep, after
he unlawfully transcribed what shouldn’t have been eavesdropped upon. Mizrahi
then illegally secreted these illegal transcripts.
under Mizrahi’s command themselves balked when asked to record conversations of
spouses, youngsters, elderly parents, doctors, service-providers, journalists,
friends and casual acquaintances.
Transcripts of idle chatter and
intimate talk remained in Mizrahi’s safe, some bound in files labeled
“political.” This is only part of what ought to engender great unease among all
who cherish the rights of even those politicians whom they don’t necessarily
No matter how Liberman’s saga concludes, it should, as per
Danino’s recommendations, lead to legal curtailments on the length of time in
which our law-enforcers can pursue a given case. It cannot be that the police
and prosecution would usurp over a decade of anyone’s life because of hunches,
even if said hunches are somehow eventually borne out after all.
Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin