NY Times: UNSC resolution may be best step to resolve Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Despite Obama’s efforts, the paper said, he “may be presiding over the death of the two-state solution.”

March 14, 2016 17:34
1 minute read.
US President Barack Obama

US President Barack Obama addresses United Nations General Assembly. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

A non-binding United Nations Security Council resolution on the two-state solution may be the next best step in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, stated a New York Times editorial published on Monday.

“There are several options, but the best may be a resolution that puts the United Nations Security Council on record supporting the basic principles of a deal covering borders, the future of Jerusalem, Palestinian refugees, security and land swaps, but not imposing anything on the two parties,” the editorial stated.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

It spoke disparagingly of the possibility that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and US President Barack Obama could make peace in the near future.

The paper stated that Netanyahu had “never shown a serious willingness” to progress toward a peace deal, “as is made clear by his expansion of Israeli settlements, which reduce the land available for a Palestinian state.”

It described Abbas as “a weak and aging leader who has given up on peace.”

Despite Obama’s efforts, the paper said, he “may be presiding over the death of the two-state solution.”

A US push for a security council resolution, even one such as the New York Times proposed, would mark a break from the Obama Administration's position that direct talks between the two parties was the best way to resolve the conflict and arrive at a two-state solution.

Last fall, however, US officials in Washington said that the president did not expect to arrive at a two-state solution by the time he leaves office in January 2017. Since then the US has pushed for a plan that would move the process forward so that the next administration could best arrive at a two-state solution.

In the absence of a US led peace process, France on Monday unveiled for the European Union its plan to jump-start the peace process by holding a multilateral peace conference this summer.

Related Content

August 15, 2018
Lebanese army says troops injured by IDF while on patrol