Obama administration warns US court: High cost of appealing terror verdict could topple PA

10 American families in February won a $655 million verdict against the PLO and PA for supporting terror; PA wishes to appeal ruling, but may need to post sizable bond.

August 11, 2015 16:46
1 minute read.
us terror trial

Courtroom sketch of US terror trial. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


NEW YORK - The Obama administration urged a US judge to "carefully consider" the Palestinian Authority's financial condition in determining the size of any bond it must post to appeal a jury's finding that it supported terrorist attacks in Israel.

The US Department of Justice filed a notice of interest in the lawsuit in Manhattan federal court late on Monday, after 10 American families in February won a $655 million verdict against the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority.

The Justice Department said the government "strongly supports" allowing terrorism victims to vindicate their interests in court.

Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken nonetheless asked US District Judge George Daniels to "carefully consider" how requiring a multimillion-dollar bond could affect the Palestinian Authority's viability, given its delicate finances.

The Palestinian Authority's collapse "would undermine several decades of US foreign policy and add a new destabilizing factor to the region, compromising national security," Blinken said.

Kent Yalowitz, the families' lawyer, said he was disappointed by the State Department position. He said that if the Palestinian Authority "has enough money to pay convicted terrorists, it has enough to pay the judgment in this case."

A spokesman for the Palestinian Authority did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The filing reflected the US government's competing interests in the diplomatically sensitive lawsuit, which has added a new dimension to the Middle East conflict.

In February, jurors found the PLO and Palestinian Authority liable for six shootings and bombings between 2002 and 2004 in the Jerusalem area, which have been attributed to the al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades and Hamas.

Those attacks killed 33 people, including several US citizens, and injured more than 450.

The jury awarded the families $218.5 million, a sum automatically tripled under a US anti-terrorism law to $655.5 million.

The PLO and the Palestinian Authority want the judgment stayed pending appeal, with no requirement to post bond.

The families counter that the defendants should deposit $30 million per month with the court. At a July hearing, Daniels signaled he might require a bond.

Now is the time to join the news event of the year - The Jerusalem Post Annual Conference!
For more information and to sign up,
click here>>

Related Content

June 16, 2019
Shin Bet chief tries to get Abbas to take partial tax payments from Israel


Cookie Settings