Olmert does dramatic U-turn in Holyland appeal

By
December 5, 2014 02:16
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Former prime minister Ehud Olmert’s legal team on Thursday took a dramatic U-turn in the appeal of his Holyland bribery conviction, denying that his brother Yossi had ever received an NIS 500,000 bribe.

They had previously agreed during the trial that Yossi had received the funds – and only disputed whether Ehud knew about it.

The issue is crucial as one of the two main foundations of Olmert’s bribery conviction was that Shmuel Duchner, the middleman who paid off politicians to get them to move the Holyland real estate project forward, gave Yossi the NIS 500,000 at Ehud’s behest.

Until now the assumption had been that Ehud admitted Yossi received the funds, but was arguing that he should be found innocent, as Duchner deposited Yossi the funds without telling him.

Much of the case revolved around Yossi’s statements about whether Ehud knew or not, but the premise was always that all sides agreed that Yossi received the funds.

This post-sentencing U-turn at the appeal stage, took the expanded five-justice Supreme Court panel by surprise, with the justices expressing consternation that Olmert would make such a change in his narrative at this point.

Related Content

Breaking news
August 18, 2018
Perpetrator Salih Khater to appear in court over U.K. parliament car crash

By REUTERS