Who’s brave enough to debate Caroline?

A popular and outspoken columnist, Glick’s speeches have been the highlights of previous conferences, both in New York and most recently in Jerusalem.

April 15, 2015 02:30
2 minute read.
Caroline Glick

Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick. (photo credit: Courtesy)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Less than two months before the annual Jerusalem Post Conference takes place in New York, a search is on to find a worthy opponent to face off against the Post’s formidable senior contributing editor Caroline Glick.

A popular and outspoken columnist, Glick’s speeches have been the highlights of previous conferences, both in New York and most recently in Jerusalem.

In addition to addressing the June 7 conference at the Marriott Marquis Hotel in Times Square, Glick is slated to debate a respected figure from the American liberal arena.

J Street director Jeremy Ben- Ami had been scheduled to step up to the plate against Glick, but his director of communications informed the Post he had “a long-standing family engagement” he could not cancel.

Will his replacement be The Atlantic contributor and White House insider Jeffrey Goldberg, NYU professor and left-wing political pundit Peter Beinart, CNN correspondent Wolf Blitzer or veteran New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman? Who will have the gumption to stand up and present cogent policy statements to counteract Glick’s well-formed opinions on the subject of the Iranian nuclear deal, the two-state solution and the relationship between the US and Israel? Whoever it is, they had better be well-prepared.

At the Post’s December conference in Jerusalem, Glick made headlines by launching a scathing attack on Danish Ambassador Jesper Vahr, after he stated that Europe should apply double standards to Israel “because you are one of us.”

In response, Glick said Vahr had made a “statement of contempt for our intelligence.”
Danish ambassador, JPost's Caroline Glick exchange verbal blows over EU attitude toward Israel

“I consider Europe’s keen interest in the Middle East, specifically Israel, to be an obsession,” she said. “It is an obsession that Jews have seen from Europeans from the time of Jesus.”

After receiving applause from the audience at the David Citadel Hotel, Glick continued: “No, I do not want to be proud that you are looking at us in a different standard from our neighbors because you are not looking at our neighbors as human beings. What you are saying is that they are objects.

The only actor in this entire region are the people they are trying to annihilate. The only people who are supposed to be judged for our actions, and always poorly, are the people who are doing everything possible – more than Europe, more than the US, more than anyone – in order to protect the lives of the Palestinians,” she said.

The upcoming debate in New York promises to be an exciting and newsworthy event. All that’s missing is a strong voice on the other side to step into the proverbial lion’s den.

Commenting on the prospective debate, Glick said: “I am a firm believer that the best way to develop successful policies is by challenging ideas. Openly debating important issues is a vital means for determining the veracity of ideas, guiding assumptions and policies. Without such debate, policymaking becomes little more than a game of chance. I always welcome the opportunity to have my ideas challenged because my goal isn’t to show that I’m right, but to ensure that Israel adopts policies that secure its future. And of course, a good debate is also great fun.”


Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Arafat Irfaiya, Ori Ansbacher's murderer, brought to court
June 19, 2019
When is rape nationalistic? - analysis


Cookie Settings