State waffles before court on Uganda deportation deal

Representatives dodge questions as to whether there’s an agreement, admit 1,749 expelled there since 2015.

April 11, 2018 09:06
2 minute read.
African migrants painted in white hold signs during a protest against the Israeli government's plan

African migrants painted in white hold signs during a protest against the Israeli government's plan to deport part of their community, in front of the Rwandan embassy in Herzliya, Israel February 7, 2018. (photo credit: AMIR COHEN/REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Despite promises to announce an agreement by Tuesday afternoon with a third-party country for deporting Israel’s African migrants, the state continued to waver before the High Court of Justice about whether it has closed such a deal.

Asked several times point blank by the justices whether there was deal, the state dodged dizzyingly left and right with vague phrases, until it finally said it would give another update within 48 hours.

On Tuesday morning, the state filed a legal brief to update the High Court, following April’s chaotic series of contradictory government policy announcements, in which it said that a deal would likely be signed within hours.

It also revealed that 1,749 migrants have already been deported to the country since 2015.

The state did not identify the voluntary or non-voluntary circumstances of deportations to the country, widely reported to be Uganda, but revealed more statistics about the deportations than have been previously revealed.

According to the state, 485 migrants were deported to the third-party country in 2015, 506 in 2016, 630 in 2017 and 128 to date in 2018.
Migrants, activists in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv protest Netanyahu's scrapping of relocation deal, April 3, 2018 (Reuters/Tamara Zieve)

All of this is despite statements by Uganda that it is not accepting migrants from Israel.

However, the justices confronted the state with Uganda’s denials of a deal and demanded a straight answer when the state at first said that there was a deal already two months ago, then inexplicably said that it was still checking aspects of updates to the deal.

Finally, when the court asked whether the country would receive migrants on an airplane if it landed there right now, the state asked for 48 hours to make additional clarifications.

The state also held a closed session without the migrants’ lawyers present, in which it answered additional questions of the court regarding the developments with the destination country.

Separately, the migrants’ lawyers also committed to updating their petitions in light of the changed government policies.

Just over a week ago, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the government was halting its policy of either deporting migrants to Rwanda or detaining those who refused deportation, in favor of a deal with the UN to facilitate deportation of around 16,000 migrants to Western countries, with another 20,000 plus migrants being allowed to stay in Israel.

However, only hours later Netanyahu suspended the UN deal. By the next day, he had reneged on the deal, with the state telling the court it was going to try to replace Rwanda with a different third-party country.

Tuesday’s brief reiterated that the government’s envoy to the country has affirmed that the treatment of African migrants being deported there meets the High Court’s required standard. Human rights groups have disputed such assurances in the past as flying in the face of voluminous anecdotes and information they have received from deported migrants.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

July 19, 2019
Ehud Barak on Gesher-Labor merger: I hope this move is not irreversible


Cookie Settings