Will the Disengagement Law in the northern West Bank be repealed?

Political fights prevent bill that will rebuild settlements.

By
October 22, 2017 20:20
1 minute read.
Homesh in 2005

jewish settlers stands on a house Homesh in 2005 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Political wrangling prevented the Ministerial Legislative Committee from approving a bill on Sunday that would repeal the 2005 Disengagement Law in northern Samaria, which allowed for the destruction of four settlements there.

The bill would rescind the military order barring Israelis from entering the sites where the Homesh, Sa-Nur, Ganim and Kadim once stood.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Right-wing politicians and settlers hope that the legislation would pave the way to rebuilding the four communities. Should the legislation be approved next week, it would move to the Knesset for its series of three votes before it could pass into law.

But the legislation hit a snag after a political fight broke out between Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked and coalition chairman MK David Bitan.

As a result, almost all private members’ bills, such as this one sponsored by Bayit Yehudi MK Shuli Moalem-Refaeli, were postponed for a week.

Moalem-Refaeli said the time had come to pass the legislation.

“This [2005] evacuation had no political or security justification, and the public understands this very well,” Moalem-Refaeli said.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


“There is no justification for barring the free movement of Jews in that area. This legislation is the foundation for the larger initiative to rebuild the four settlements,” Moalem-Refaeli said.

In 2005, Israel unilaterally destroyed 21 settlements in the Gaza Strip and withdrew from that area militarily, handing it over to the Palestinian Authority.

At the same time, it destroyed four settlements in northern Samaria but retained its military hold on that land, which is part of Area C of the West Bank. Right-wing politicians and settlers have long argued, therefore, that only a lack of political intervention will prevent the reconstruction of those former communities.

“After waiting 11 years, every extra minute is unnecessary,” said Samaria Regional Council head Yossi Dagan, who is an evacuee from Homesh.

“It’s time to cancel the Disengagement Law everywhere and certainly in northern Samaria. The settlements are waiting for their residents to return. The roads, the electricity poles and the stairs are still there, as is the folly and the time has come to cancel that,” Dagan said.

In August, right-wing politicians held a political rally and a small festival at the site of the former Sa-Nur settlement, where they called on Netanyahu to rebuild the four destroyed communities.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

National Security Advisor, Yossi Cohen
October 22, 2018
Mossad chief wary of high-tech intelligence

By REUTERS