High Court: Enforce Amona demolition

Petition demands explanation on illegal outpost from the govm't.

By JPOST.COM STAFF
May 5, 2010 13:10
High Court of Justice [file]

high court panel citizenship law 311. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The High Court of Justice issued an interlocutory order on Wednesday, asking the State to explain why it was refraining from enforcing demolition orders issued for the buildings in the illegal West Bank outpost of Amona.

High Court justices Dorit Beinish, Eliezer Rivlin and Elyakim Rubinstein issued the order during a hearing held on the petition filed by 10 Palestinian land owners with assistance by human rights group Yesh Din. The justices ordered the state "to explain within 90 days why the State will not enforce the demolition orders issued for the compound in question.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The order entailed that the State issue an affidavit to explain why it believes the High Court should refrain from issuing a binding order for the demolition of the outpost.

In the State’s response to the petition, it acknowledged the fact that the outpost was built illegally, but added that the petition should be rejected as the current West Bank building freeze does not allow it to enforce previous demolition orders.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN