The choice for Russia and China

Will they join the world in preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons?

By
May 9, 2006 20:25
3 minute read.
GOOD

iaea 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

For the first time in 27 years, the Iranian government has transmitted an official letter to a US president. Though the timing of the letter strongly indicates that it is designed to block UN Security Council action against the Iranian regime, it should have the opposite effect. The 18-page letter was sent just as foreign ministers from the Security Council's five permanent members were meeting to discuss Iran. Though the Iranians imaginatively describe it as offering "solutions" to world problems, The Washington Post gave a more accurate summary, reporting that it "[argued] that liberalism and democracy had failed, and criticized the United States over a host of issues ranging from the invasion of Iraq to its support for Israel." "Liberalism and Western-style democracy have not been able to help realize the ideals of humanity," the Associated Press quotes the letter. "Today these two concepts have failed. Those with insight can already hear the sounds of the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic systems." Touching only indirectly on the nuclear issue, the regime claims to be mystified as to why "any technological and scientific achievement reached in the Middle East region is translated into and portrayed as a threat to the Zionist regime." Perhaps Iranian calls to "wipe Israel off the map" have something to do with this. Even as it tries to portray itself as extending an olive branch, the regime cannot resist lapsing into barely-concealed threats: "How much longer will the blood of the innocent men, women and children be spilled on the streets, and people's houses destroyed over their heads? Are you pleased with the current condition of the world? Do you think present policies can continue?" President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's letter, far from diverting the UN from its path toward imposing sanctions on Iran, should reenforce Western determination to confront this delusional regime. Through it make little sense when seen through the West's prism of nations acting in their rational self-interest, it has become abundantly clear that the mullahs are, ironically, on a crusade to confront the entire West and everything it stands for. Rather than seeking to avoid a "clash of civilizations," the mullahs seem to be relishing this prospect, and view every escalation in their own belligerence as helping to protect, rather than endanger, their regime. It was encouraging, in this context, to hear Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claim this week that "all of us agreed that Iran must not have nuclear weapons." But three hours of talks among the permanent five Security Council powers failed to produce agreement on strategy. The US, France and Britain all reportedly want the UN to start proceeding toward binding sanctions under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter; Russia and China want to stay on the non-binding resolution track. It should be obvious at this point that even draconian sanctions may not be sufficient to turn Iran away from its present course; it is all the more clear that non-binding resolutions are at best a waste of time. The choice before Russia and China is unmistakable: Will they join the world in an attempt to peacefully prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, or will the US and Europe be forced to move ahead without them? Though Europeans tend to bristle at suggestions that it might be necessary to take the sanctions campaign outside the UN, or that military force might be necessary, we can only hope that - behind closed doors - Europe and the US are together presenting these options to Russia and China as the only alternatives to effective UN action. As US Sen. John McCain puts it, "There's only one thing worse than the United States exercising the military option, that is a nuclear-armed Iran." The Iranian threat is the greatest challenge to world peace since the end of the Cold War and, before that, the rise of fascism in Europe and East Asia. There are many ways the much-stronger West can defeat this unpopular and belligerent dictatorship. There is only one way we can lose: by failing to lift a finger - diplomatic, economic or military - in our collective self-defense.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Israeli stock market traders work at their office in the Meitav investment house in Tel Aviv
October 18, 2018
YOUR INVESTMENTS: Is the middle road paved with gold?

By AARON KATSMAN