Mizrahi culture

In part, anti-Mizrahi sentiments were tightly connected to secular Zionism’s rebellion against the Jewish religion as it developed in the Diaspora.

By
July 11, 2016 20:41
3 minute read.
Flag of Israel

Flag of Israel. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

It is no secret that Israel’s founders – the majority of whom were Eastern European Jews – held negative views about their Mizrahi Jewish brothers and sisters.

And the echoes of their prejudices are felt to this day.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


In part, anti-Mizrahi sentiments were tightly connected to secular Zionism’s rebellion against the Jewish religion as it developed in the Diaspora. The vast majority of Ashkenazi Zionists abandoned the traditional lifestyle of the Eastern European shtetl and embraced various forms of secular nationalism, from the socialist Zionism of thinkers such as Ber Borochov and Berl Katzenelson to the Revisionist ideology promulgated by Ze’ev Jabotinsky.

Indeed, Zionism’s success depended on it making a violent break with traditional Judaism’s virulent opposition to Jewish nationalism that called for a return to the Land of Israel. Mizrahi Jews, who were traditional, were said to need “re-education.” The IDF was utilized as a catalyst for the secular Zionist melting pot.

Echoes of this disdain for Mizrahi religious culture were evident in the diatribe launched Saturday on Facebook by Army Radio’s film critic, Gidi Orsher, which has aroused much controversy, including calls by Culture and Sports Minister Miri Regev, herself a Mizrahi Jew, to fire Orsher.

Addressing Mizrahi Jews, Orsher wrote: “Next time you have a heart attack, skip catheterization and use your grandmother’s remedy of putting a chicken leg on your head instead.” The next time there is a rocket attack, Mizrahi Jews should “ignore the Iron Dome and recite Psalms or perhaps wait for the matriarch Rachel to protect you.”

Mizrahim who have difficulty conceiving should, “continue the practice of praying for fertility at the graves of dead rabbis in the Galilee.”

The prejudiced views held by the Ashkenazi elite against their Mizrahi brothers and sisters is not just the result of a secular revolt against rabbinic Judaism. It is also tied to Labor Zionism’s rejection of liberalism and lack of respect for individuality and its insistence on the creation of a homogeneous Israeli society in its own image: European, socialist and secular.


The 1977 political upheaval by the Likud headed by Menachem Begin revealed the deep bitterness felt by Mizrahi Israelis. It was no coincidence that Jews who immigrated to Israel from Muslim lands were attracted to the Likud. It wasn’t just Begin’s demagoguery. Mizrahim were rejecting Labor Zionism’s paternalism in favor of liberalism and respect for individual identity.

Nearly 40 years after the Likud’s political upset, however, the roots of Ashkenazi prejudices against Mizrahim remain with us. To this day we feel the effects of whole towns that were segregated in the 1950s along ethnic lines: Moroccans to one place, Poles to another. Thousands of communities across the nation maintain “acceptance committees,” a throwback to the Zionist socialist kibbutzim and moshavim, that are charged with keeping out “undesirables.”

Our school system is split between “periphery” – a PC term for predominantly Mizrahi (and Ethiopian) towns – and “center,” which is dominated by Ashkenazim and Mizrahim who have undergone a process of so-called “Ashkenization.”

It is the obligation of our political leaders to combat this painful legacy of the 1950s and 1960s. One important step that has been taken is to make a conscious effort to teach Sephardi and Mizrahi culture in our school systems.

The Biton Committee, headed by poet Erez Biton, has recently submitted a 350-page report that offers detailed recommendations for all educational institutions – from kindergartens to colleges and universities. History and literature curricula should be updated to include the contributions of Jews from Muslim countries. A week a year should be set aside to deal specifically with the culture of the Jews of the East and of Spain. The Education Ministry should be praised for its openness to this endeavor.

But it is also important to confront the root causes of the State of Israel’s institutionalized prejudices against Mizrahim. For too long the Israeli Left was in denial, because it was responsible for the discrimination. Meanwhile, the Right was reluctant to confront this prejudice, because it reflected badly on the State of Israel.

We have a duty to champion liberalism and a respect for individuality and reject the paternalism and melting pot culture of the early years of the State of Israel. Our diversity should be celebrated, not denigrated.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

A man holds a laptop computer as cyber code is projected on him
December 9, 2018
Think About It: Senior citizens and digital banking

By SUSAN HATTIS ROLEF