Trump's campaign website remains 'neutral' on Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Trump originally posted his issues video on Israel on March 6, amid controversy over his original remark on neutrality in the conflict back in February.

August 17, 2016 16:10
2 minute read.

US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) 2016 Policy Conference. (photo credit: SAUL LOEB / AFP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


WASHINGTON – Not since March has Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, uttered the word “neutral” in reference to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, ever since drawing ire from Democrats and Republicans alike for his use of the term.

And yet, if undecided, unknowing voters were to explore the GOP candidate’s positions by visiting his website for the first time today – six months later – they would find a video that states he still very much intends to remain a noncommittal arbiter of the decades-old conflict.

“It’s probably the hardest negotiation there is – great negotiators have tried and they failed,” Trump states in a video posted under the “issues” section of his official campaign website. “It’s just so deep-seeded – the hatred, the level of distrust – but I’m going to give it an awfully good shot. I want to remain as neutral as possible because, if you’re not somewhat neutral, the other side is never going to do it. But just remember, Israel, I love you. We’re going to see if we can get something done. It has to be done for both sides. It cannot continue to be the way it is.”

That last assertion – that the status quo is unsustainable – places Trump closer to the current position of the State Department than it does to Trump’s own advisers on Israel, who say it should be up to the Israeli government to decide how to proceed with the Palestinians.

The State Department supports direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority that results in a two-state solution – a permanent settlement ending all claims. Toward that end, the department – under direction from both Democrats and Republicans – has pushed Israel to end its settlement activity in the West Bank, and for the Palestinian Authority to halt its incitement of violence against Jewish Israeli civilians.

​Trump originally posted his issues video on Israel on March 6, amid controversy over his original remark on neutrality in the conflict back in February. Later in March, Trump appeared to walk back the position in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer: “It’s probably not possible” to be neutral, he said, ​“because there’s so much hatred.” He has refrained from using the term ever since.

In a speech delivered this week on his plan to combat the scourge of terrorism worldwide, Trump referred to Israel as America’s “greatest ally,” and accused foreign peoples of importing the ideology of anti-Semitism to the United States.

But a group of GOP national security officials expressed concern to The Jerusalem Post last week that Trump’s doctrine of unpredictability on decades-old, law-bound treaty alliances may apply to relations with the Jewish state; and his campaign has been stained by support for legions of Jewish conspiracy theorists, who have taken to social media in common cause with his candidacy.

Hillary Clinton attacked the position in her speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee on March 21, questioning why Trump would be willing to draw a moral equivalence between the two sides of the conflict.

​“W​e need steady hands, not a president who says he’s neutral on Monday, pro-Israel on Tuesday and who knows what on Wednesday because everything i​s negotiable,​“​ Clinton​. ​“​Well, my friends, Israel’s security is non-negotiable.​”

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Christian friends of Israel take part in the Feast of the Tabernacles celebrations in Jerusalem
September 26, 2018
Friends of Zion Flood Jerusalem