Switzerland blocks bid to end funding for UN Palestinian agency after outrage

On Thursday, the upper house of parliament opted not to axe the agency's funding by 23 to 21 votes, a decision that was warmly welcomed by UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini.

 AN UNRWA healthcare center in Nablus. (photo credit: NASSER ISHTAYEH/FLASH90)
AN UNRWA healthcare center in Nablus.
(photo credit: NASSER ISHTAYEH/FLASH90)

The upper house of the Swiss parliament on Thursday blocked an initiative to end the funding of the UN Palestinian refugee agency (UNRWA) after aid groups voiced outrage.

Switzerland's National Council, the lower house of the Federal Assembly, approved scrapping an annual contribution of 20 million Swiss francs ($23 million) to the agency by 116 to 78 votes on Monday.

On Thursday, the upper house of parliament opted not to axe the agency's funding by 23 to 21 votes, a decision that was warmly welcomed by UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini. Both houses would have needed to approve the initiative for it to go ahead.

"As far as I'm concerned, it's a positive development," he told reporters on the sidelines of the Global Refugee Forum in Geneva.

"It's important that Switzerland continue to tell to the Palestinians and to the region that it remains committed to its humanitarian tradition... These 20 million are absolutely essential for UNRWA to continue to deliver its lifesaving and humanitarian assistance in the Gaza strip."

 AN UNRWA ELEMENTARY school for boys in the Gaza Strip. (credit: Ahmad Khateib/Flash90)
AN UNRWA ELEMENTARY school for boys in the Gaza Strip. (credit: Ahmad Khateib/Flash90)

UNRWA chief says cutting aid threatens Gazans

Lazzarini, who said he had been disheartened by the initiative, said that cutting funds jeopardized UNRWA's ability to provide aid to the people of Gaza. He had previously denounced what he called a deliberate attempt to strangle UNRWA's operations.

The author of the Swiss legislative initiative, who was part of a parliamentary delegation that visited UNRWA earlier this year, has argued that the agency lacked objectivity.