State: Don’t call operation ‘war’

War title would require greater compensation to civilians who suffered financial loss during Operation Protective Edge.

August 13, 2014 05:09
1 minute read.

Israeli soldiers from the armoured corps celebrate their return to Israel after pulling out of Gaza. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The state-attorney’s office has requested that a petition to the High Court of Justice demanding that Operation Protective Edge be declared a war be denied, it said in a response submitted Tuesday.

The petition was filed by the Front for the Public Defense with the purpose of securing greater compensation to civilians who suffered financial loss from the hostilities of the conflict.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

The organization claimed that currently, special compensation for civilians for losses incurred only applies to the Gaza border communities but the entire home front was damaged by the conflict with “rockets landing in the heart of Israeli cities in the country’s center.”

In its response to the petition, the state argued that not all avenues for dealing with the issue of compensation had been exhausted.

It said the petition should be rejected in principle for two reasons.

The state-attorney argued that the government is granted very broad discretion with regard to foreign policy and security in general, and the declaration of war in particular, and therefore there was no room for the High Court to instruct the government how to act in this regard.

The state also denied the claim of the petitioners that “the need to declare that war had been initiated was a socio-economic requirement of the first order,” arguing that the simple declaration of war does not automatically allow for the granting of compensation or financial assistance to those affected.

The state-attorney said compensation for war losses are determined by the Law for Property Tax and Compensations Funds, and do not require a declaration of war for the granting of such monies.

Related Content

Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman convenes with IDF officers in the Gaza region
July 20, 2018
Liberman: Hamas is forcing Israel into a larger Gaza war than 2014