New in the EU: Unified patent system built

New in the EU Unified p

By ARI SYRQUIN
December 16, 2009 06:25
2 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The European Council adopted the finishing touches this month on a new patent system for Europe. The package agreed on covers elements intended to bring about a single EU patent and establish a new patent court in the EU. Both together are hoped to make it less costly for businesses to protect innovative technology and make litigation more accessible and predictable. The Council agreement encompasses the main features of a future patent court in the EU. A specialized patent court will allow cases to be heard before judges with the highest level of legal and technical expertise in patents. A unified court will also mean that parties do not have to litigate in different countries, incurring high costs. Parallel litigation can amount to more than €500,000 in a typical case, which can be cut drastically by a unified court, saving as much as €289 million each year for European companies. The court will include local and central chambers under a common appeal court. In the initial stages, parties will be able to continue to use national courts, allowing confidence to build up gradually in the new system. The decision is currently awaiting review by the European Court of Justice. Ministers have also agreed on an approach to EU patent regulation. The idea of an EU patent was originally proposed by the European Commission in 2000 under the Lisbon strategy, but negotiations stalled in 2004. The creation of an EU patent would help to improve the current situation, where a patent valid in just 13 EU member states is 11 times more expensive than a US patent. However, the creation of the EU patent will depend on a solution to be found on the subject of translation. A common understanding has also been reached on renewal fees and the cooperation between patent offices. Renewal fees will be set at a level to facilitate European innovation and foster competitiveness. Furthermore, the EU patent will involve partnerships between patent offices in Europe to allow more rapid delivery of patents and increase speed of access to market for innovative products and services. The current fragmentation of the patent system in Europe and in particular the lack of a unitary title and the absence of a unified patent litigation system renders access to the patent system complex and costly and hampers effective enforcement of patents, especially for smaller businesses. Innovators wishing to protect their invention in various member states of the community can currently achieve this protection only through separate national patents or through a European patent. This system entails multi-forum litigation, since companies may have to litigate in parallel in all countries where the patent is validated. Stakeholders have repeatedly reported that this involves considerable cost, complexity and legal insecurity resulting from the risk of contradicting court decisions in different member states. The new proposal may mean that protecting patents in Europe will no longer be a costly journey with an unknown end. syrquin@013.net The author is the head of the International Department at GSCB Law Firm.

Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection

By GLOBES, NIV ELIS