Report: Abbas softens objection to interim peace deal with Israel

Israel Radio: Palestinian Authority no longer rejecting interim peace deal out of hand, pushing for permanent solution.

October 29, 2013 09:42
2 minute read.
Netanyahu and Abbas were unsuccessful in 2010, will this time around be different?

Abbas and Netanyahu 2010 370. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is "softening his resistance" to an interim agreement in ongoing peace talks with Israel, Israel Radio reported on Tuesday.

Abbas has thus far rejected such an agreement, insisting on a final-status deal that would include arrangements on the contentious issues of Jerusalem and the Palestinian right of return.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

In his speech to the UN General Assembly in September, Abbas emphatically rejected the idea of an interim agreement.

"We reaffirm that we refuse to enter into a vortex of a new interim agreement that becomes eternalized, or to enter into transitional arrangements that will become a fixed rule rather than an urgent exception. Our objective is to achieve a permanent and comprehensive agreement and a peace treaty between the States of Palestine and Israel that resolves all outstanding issues and answers all questions, which allows us to officially declare an end of conflict and claims," the Palestinian leader stated.

According to the Israel Radio report, Abbas has toned down his opposition to an interim deal after three months of negotiations and is no longer "rejecting out of hand" the possibility of such an agreement despite his public pronouncements.

In an interview with The Jerusalem Post earlier this month, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, who is serving as Israel's chief negotiator in peace talks with the Palestinians, denied that she was seeking an interim agreement.

Hardline Likud deputy ministers Danny Danon and Ze’ev Elkin had accused Livni of working on achieving an interim deal with the PA that would create a Palestinian state in temporary borders.

Livni told the Post, "My goal is an agreement that will end the conflict and all claims for both sides. I have never used the term ‘interim agreement.’”

Livni explained that a partial agreement would not work with the negotiating tactics used by both sides in her talks with the PA. She said there could not be give and take if it is not clear that all issues will be resolved in the process.

“These tactics maintain our interests in the negotiating room,” she said.

Neither Elkin nor Danon were convinced by Livni's statements, expressing worry that US pressure could lead Israel to accept an interim agreement.

“I don’t doubt that she wants to achieve a permanent agreement based on 1967 lines like she tried to do in the Annapolis process,” Elkin said. “My concern is that when there inevitably will be difficulties in the attempts to reach a final-status deal, an interim deal will be pursued. That would be a big mistake.”

Citing the Oslo process and the Gaza Strip withdrawal, the deputy foreign minister said history had proven attempts to reach a permanent agreement via interim stages very dangerous.

“I cannot relax, because I don’t know what will happen and what kind of American pressure there will be when the nine-month deadline to reach a deal approaches,” Elkin said.

Danon also expressed his lack of confidence in Israel’s chief negotiator.

“We saw the results of the negotiations during the time of [prime minister Ehud] Olmert and [then-foreign minister] Livni,” Danon said. “We will not let her lead the government to such a dangerous path.”

Gil Hoffman contributed to this report.

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN