A general view of the Bushehr main nuclear reactor 311 R.
(photo credit: Reuters/ Raheb Homavandi)
WASHINGTON – A conference in the Netherlands on chemical weapon nonproliferation
on Tuesday became yet another venue for the standoff between Washington and
RELATED:US uncertain Israel would advise before Iran strike
During the meeting, Robert P. Mikulak, the US permanent
representative to the 16th session of the Conference of the States Parties of
the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), exercised his
right of response to rebut claims by the Iranian representative, Ambassador to
the Netherlands Bozorgmehr Ziaran.
“Perhaps I should thank him for giving
such a prominent place to the United States in what he said. My country is
mentioned more than 10 times in the text. But alas, there were no kind words,
only a political rant against the United States that is apparently mostly
intended for domestic consumption in Iran. But it’s sad that Iran chose to use
this meeting for political mud-slinging, rather than for a rational discussion
of the issues that the Conference must resolve,” Mikulak said at The
He described as “poppycock” allegations made by Iran that the
United States will deliberately not comply with an April 2012 deadline for the
destruction of chemical weapons.
“A delay in destroying one’s stockpile,
even though we are destroying it as rapidly as practicable, is not a deliberate
attempt to illicitly retain chemical weapons. Such an accusation is absurd – or
to use a synonym with its origins in the Dutch language – poppycock. Our
chemical weapons stockpile, which remains under full OPCW verification, does not
pose a security threat to anyone, while others’ illicit acquisition and
retention efforts pose a threat to us all,” Mikulak continued, jibbing at Iran,
which was recently discovered to have supplied Libya with chemical
He also touched on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “Illicit
acquisition and retention efforts of weapons of mass destruction threaten us
all. In this connection, I need only recall the resolution adopted in Vienna at
the IAEA on 18 November 2011 which stressed ‘that Iran continues to defy the
requirements and obligations contained in the relevant IAEA Board of Governors
and UN Security Resolutions’ related to implementation of nuclear safeguards.
It’s doubly ironic that that the rule of law and the nuclear issue seem to have
been brought into the OPCW by the delegation of Iran,” Mikulak said.