Eye on Iran: Forget the consensus

In the new millennium we need to reassess scenarios that were thought to be wholly unacceptable in the sixties. Posted by Craig.

July 25, 2006 14:05
1 minute read.
eye on iran blog 88

eye on iran blog 88. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Posted by Craig, USA Ahmadinejad fancies himself a prophet and surrounds himself with followers and threatens America - the only country to have used the bomb. We need to review the rules of war and engagement in light of terrorism. If we are attacked, we first attempt to address the damage, agree on the response and then attempt to get a consensus. I would suggest that we forget about the consensus part and just respond accordingly. Israel has respect for how they address issues and responds in a way that only the middle east can understand. They hate Israel and therefore Israel can take appropriate measures without concern how they may be viewed by others within the region. I honestly feel the United States would worry about how we would be viewed by our own peer group before we would respond. I feel we need to reevaluate our strategic goals and update our nuclear arsenal. In the new millennium we need to reassess scenarios that were thought to be wholly unacceptable in the sixties. I'm sorry to say, but give us 100-dollar-a-barrel oil, a very cold winter and a hotter than usual summer and stir gently - throw in an attack by Iran and "walla!".... consensus. In closing, I would also recommend that we make it known to everyone that if we are attacked, we will do whatever it takes to take the country that supports the offenders and all their resources to be used in any way we see fit; like stabilizing oil supplies with cheaper oil to all countries - a lot cheaper oil.

JPost.com welcomes your blog entry on Iran. Please make sure to include your name and location in your entry.
Previous blog entries: Israel safe from Iran, US not Between a rock and a hard place Failure Between fact and propaganda Failure of the theocratic state Kaleidoscope of madness A dangerous distraction Making the threat real Three must-reads The propaganda war A ticking bomb Misunderstood motives The true threat Missing answers Playing along In the light of history Bullying Israel

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations