'Israel should trust Obama to stop Iran nukes'

Full exclusive interview: Dagan says nuclear knowledge can't be eliminated, Iran regime will choose survival over atomic weapon.

By
April 5, 2012 18:00
2 minute read.
Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan

Meir Dagan 370. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Israel should trust US President Barack Obama when he says that he will not let Iran build a nuclear weapon, former Mossad head Meir Dagan told The Jerusalem Post this week.

“If the US president says that he is not going to allow Iran to reach nuclear capability, if we are not going to trust him, then who are we going to trust?” Dagan said.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.




He told the Post that Israel was making a mistake by portraying the issue of Tehran’s nuclear ambitions as one of Israel against Iran, and should leave the question to the international community.

“We are now in a situation where [Iran’s nuclear program] is the main interest of most of the countries in the region and the US and the international community,” he said. “We never, ever had anything against the people of Iran, and I think that a problem that is creating such a great threat to the region and to the stability of the region and the economy of the region should be dealt with as an international issue.”

Dagan, who stepped down as head of the Mossad just over a year ago and now heads oil, gas and uranium exploration company Gulliver Energy, said that a strike on Iran would not be able to halt the Islamic Republic’s drive for nuclear weapons, as such a move could only destroy infrastructure, not nuclear know-how.

“Knowledge on the nuclear issue is something that you are not able to prevent, because knowledge is something that remains in the brains of people,” he said. “You are not capable, really, of eliminating knowledge from people.”

Click here for full Jpost coverage of the Iranian threat

He repeated his view that an attack would lead Israel into a regional war conducted mostly through Tehran’s proxies, Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and perhaps even Syria.

Given that a regional war is the likely outcome of attacking Iran and that it would only be able to delay the project, not to stop it, the question arises whether an attack is the best solution to the issue, Dagan said.

“I believe that such a solution should be a tool available to the political level, but I’m not sure it should be the first option. It should be the last option,” he said.

He added that he believed the Iranian regime to be a rational regime and said that in his estimate, Tehran would back down from its nuclear weapons ambition if faced with choosing between the program and its own survival.

“If they were to face a situation where they would have to judge the survival of the regime versus the [nuclear] project, I believe they would choose the survival of the regime,” Dagan said.

Dagan rejected claims that his comments would give the Iranians a sense that they could act with impunity.

“If someone like me is speaking against [attacking Iran], then the Iranians have to understand that Israel is probably considering seriously doing so. Then, in a way, it’s helping those efforts, making it a reliable scenario,” he said.

For the full interview with Meir Dagan, see this week’s Magazine.

Meir Dagan will discuss the Iranian nuclear threat at the first annual Jerusalem Post Conference in New York on April 29.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB