S. Africa puts brakes on Iran sanctions

Proposed amendments to draft resolution could delay security council vote.

March 19, 2007 22:48
3 minute read.
jpost services and tools

jp.services1. (photo credit: )


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


South Africa called Monday for a 90-day "time out" on sanctions against Iran and said a resolution drafted by six world powers should drop an embargo on arms exports and financial sanctions targeting Iran's Revolutionary Guards and an Iranian bank. The proposals by South Africa, which holds the presidency of the UN Security Council this month, were obtained by The Associated Press ahead of an informal council meeting Tuesday and the first formal discussion Wednesday on the draft resolution. Germany and the five veto-wielding permanent council nations - the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France - agreed on modest new sanctions Thursday to step up pressure on Iran to suspend uranium enrichment, which can be used to produce nuclear energy or nuclear weapons. But South Africa and the nine other non-permanent council members were not part of the negotiations and only received the draft Thursday to consider and propose changes.

  • Netanyahu gives Iran sanctions a year
    JPost.com special: news, opinion, blogs and more
    The extensive amendments to the draft proposed by South African could delay a vote on the resolution, though with support from the five permanent members the draft is almost certain to be adopted. France's UN Ambassador Jean-Marc de La Sabliere said the South African amendments were not consistent with the approach of the six powers. "It weakened a lot the resolution, and we thing that pressure should be put on Iran," he said. In its paper on "required amendments to the new draft," South Africa backed a proposal made late January by UN nuclear chief Mohamed ElBaradei at the World Economic Forum in Davos for a 90-day "simultaneous time out" as a way to defuse tensions. Under ElBaradei's suggestion, Iran would suspend its enrichment activities and the Security Council would put on hold implementing sanctions so both sides could "go to the negotiating table" in hopes of achieving a comprehensive settlement not only covering nuclear issues but security, economic and political concerns as well. The South African paper said "the 90 day period of grace provided to Iran would allow for a de-escalation of tensions and create an opportunity for Iran and the other parties involved to resume negotiations towards a long-term peaceful solution." "This short period would be sufficient to make progress with political negotiations but would be insignificant in terms of the further advancement of Iran's enrichment program," the paper said. The South African paper also said "the resolution should focus only on Iran's nuclear program" and proposed amendments that would drop the ban on Iranian arms exports and voluntary calls on all countries "to exercise vigilance and restraint" in supplying arms to Teheran. A call on all countries and institutions "not to enter into new commitments for grants, financial assistance and concessional loans" to the Iranian government would also be dropped. For the same reasons, the South Africans proposed amendments that would eliminate all seven members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and three organizations affiliated with the elite military corps from the list of those subject to an asset freeze and travel "vigilance." The Revolutionary Guard oversees vital Iranian interests, including oil and natural gas installations and the nation's missile arsenal. The South African proposal would also eliminate Bank Sepah and Bank Sepah International, and the bank's chairman, Ahmad Derakhandeh, from the list of those subject to an asset freeze. South Africa stressed that the resolution should "only provide for proportional, incremental and reversible measures directed towards the nuclear program that would support a peaceful and negotiated solution to the outstanding questions related to Iran's nuclear program." "Sanctions should never be adopted in haste when other tracks for the peaceful resolution of a situation should be addressed," the paper said. South Africa's UN Ambassador Dumisani Kumalo, who refused to comment on the specifics of the proposal except to say that it was following ElBaradei's suggestion, said the country wants to stress the importance of political negotiations. "South Africa is not a window dressing in this council," he said when asked about the extensive amendments. "We have started engaging with" the permanent members. "It's just ideas we're proposing," Kumalo said. "If they don't work, I have to go back to my capital and say they didn't work, but they're not take it or leave it."

    Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

  • Related Content

    Bushehr nuclear Iranian
    August 5, 2014
    Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations