MK submits bill to restrict Supreme Court

‘We should restore the position of the court’

March 27, 2017 20:23
2 minute read.

The Supreme Court, Jerusalem. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


MK Moti Yogev (Bayit Yehudi) on Monday submitted a bill to strip the Supreme Court of powers it assumed during the “judicial revolution” of 1995. The bill seeks to remove the court’s the ability to annul laws it finds unconstitutional by adopting “the British model,” by which the court may point out when a normal law contradicts a Basic Law but ultimately allows the legislature to decide whether to abrogate it. The bill is cosponsored by lawmakers from five coalition parties.

“With the absence of a formal constitution, the authority to legislate is given to the Knesset as the house of public representatives, and the duty of the court ends with interpreting and implementing the law, when it is asked to settle disputes,” the bill’s explanatory notes state.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

It also explains the “judicial revolution” of 1995, when the court determined it can cancel a law passed by the Knesset if it contradicts a Basic Law in the case of United Mizrahi Bank Ltd. vs Migdal Kfar Shitufi. The court, led by then-president Aharon Barak, based on its interpretation of the newly passed Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty.

“The Supreme Court changed the situation completely and then decided that it has the ability to annul laws, although this authority was never given to it,” the bill’s notes state. “So far, the Supreme Court annulled 14 laws and thus prevented the Knesset from fulfilling the will of people, as it should be in a democratic regime.”

In 2015, Yogev – in response to a ruling from the justices about razing settlers’ homes – said that a D-9 armored bulldozer should be sent to raze the court. After a wave of criticism, Yogev described his comments as a “bad metaphor.”

In response to the submission of the bill, Meretz chairwoman Zehava Gal-On said it is yet another attempt by the Bayit Yehudi Party to harass the Supreme Court and to promote controversial legislation.

“After [Justice Minister] Ayelet Shaked announced a ‘revolution’ in the Supreme Court when she appointed four new justices, the coalition is still panicking that the court will be activist,” she said. “They want complete freedom to crush our democracy and to legislate racist and anti-democratic bills.”


Gal-On added that “they should stop acting like a bunch of cowards and declare their real intention – erasing the value of equality under the law and making Israel a democracy for Jews only.”

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

September 22, 2018
Celebrating health in the President’s sukkah