Police chief pushes in Knesset c’tee to keep intel from defense lawyers

Bar association says bill should cause us to tremble.

July 11, 2016 20:03
1 minute read.
Police Commissioner Roni Alsheich‏

Police Commissioner Roni Alsheich‏. (photo credit: POLICE SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Israel Police Insp.-Gen. Roni Alsheich on Monday urged the Knesset Law, Constitution and Justice Committee to adopt a bill to allow law enforcement authorities to decide what intelligence evidence may be given to defendants in their defense.

Under the law, the prosecution must provide defendants with all relevant evidence to their defense. This has led to complaints that sometimes intelligence sources are thereby revealed by court order or by accident, and that manpower and state funds are wasted on transferring material or filing motions to obtain a court order that specific evidence must remain classified.

Alsheich told the committee that without a change in the law, the drain in resources means the police are spending most of their time trying to help the prosecution get convictions while protecting their intelligence sources, instead of working to prevent the next crime.

In contrast, he said the police should spend 80 percent of its energy on stopping crime.

Alsheich’s bill is modified from an earlier proposal, saying that defendants would still be entitled to see all evidence connected to their indictment.

The watered down bill seems to have garnered the support of many committee members, including chairman Nissan Slomiansky, the Israel Bar Association, the Public Defender’s Office, and the Association for Civil Rights. However, Meretz MK Michal Rozin still objected.

Nevertheless, the Bar Association said there are three reasons to react “with trembling” to calls to reduce the rights of defendants to defend themselves by limiting what evidence they get to see. It mentioned a massive gap in power and information between the law enforcement authorities and defense lawyers, along with an increasing possibility of wrongful convictions of innocent persons.

It noted further that the prosecution has an incentive to underplay what evidence might relate to the indictment, as it is rewarded more for convictions.

Finally, the Bar Association said that no one has explained the need for a change. It added that leaks of intelligence sources should be stopped by police being more careful, not by changing the entire law, and saving time and money cannot be the basis for harming defendants’ fundamental right to defending themselves.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

A woman casts her ballot at a polling station in Tel Aviv, April 9, 2019
May 26, 2019
Do you think Israel is heading to elections? Take our poll