Rape crisis center condemns IDF decision not to allow victim to speak

Association's director says military court's decision to turn request by female IDF soldier's to voice opinion of plea agreemnt is "outrageous and extremely unreasonable."

By HAYAH GOLDLIST-EICHLER
May 7, 2015 21:59
1 minute read.
Sexual harassment

Sexual harassment victim [Illustrative]. (photo credit: INIMAGE)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel on Thursday condemned the military prosecutor’s decision not to allow May Fattal to speak at the plea agreement signing for Liran Hajbi. Hajbi, the commander of the Tzabar Battalion in the Givati Brigade, was indicted in March after Fattal filed a complaint against him for sexual harassment.

The plea agreement, signed by Hajbi, finds him guilty of five counts of misconduct but does not mention sexual harassment or indecent acts.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Fattal asked to speak at the plea agreement signing to protest the deal that was made, but was turned down by the military prosecutor.

“The decision of the military court not to allow a female IDF soldier, who was sexually harassed, to voice her opinion on the plea agreement against Hajbi is outrageous and extremely unreasonable,” said Orit Sulitzeanu, executive director of the association of rape crisis centers in Israel. “Is there a fear that the foundations of the court will collapse due to a soldier who was sexually assaulted speaking out? Is the concern that things will be said that will shame the IDF and the way it dealt with this case?”

Sulitzeanu explained that victims of sexual assault are deprived of control over their bodies and it is therefore of utmost importance to allow them to be heard with regards to a plea agreement, thereby returning some amount of control to the victim. She added that the decision sends a message to female soldiers and their families that not only does the IDF tolerate harassment and assault of female soldiers, but it also does not support the victims or grant them the respect of being heard.

Both Hajbi’s lawyer and the military prosecutor stated that Fattal was consulted before the plea agreement was accepted and she approved of the deal.

Related Content

MIGRANT WORKERS outside the central bus station in Tel Aviv.
August 19, 2018
Police arrest 83 suspects after Immigration Authority bribery scandal

By TAMARA ZIEVE