High Court rejects petition to fire Hanegbi

Rules that because no indictment has been filed, law doesn't require him to step down.

March 6, 2006 20:44
1 minute read.
tzahi hanegbi 298.88

tzahi hanegbi 298.88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The High Court of Justice on Monday rejected a petition by the Movement for Quality Government calling on Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to fire Tzahi Hanegbi from the cabinet. The watchdog organization submitted the petition after Attorney-General Menahem Mazuz announced that he had decided to indict Hanegbi for political appointments he allegedly made while serving as Minister of the Environment during the years 2001-2003. But Mazuz added that he would only make his final decision after granting Hanegbi a hearing. The court has already ruled in the past that a minister served with an indictment must resign. In its ruling on Tuesday, however, it pointed out that even this ruling, made in the case of former Interior Minister Aryeh Deri, had been handed down in a situation where the allegations against the minister had been particularly serious. In the case of Hanegbi, not only had Mazuz not made a final decision as to whether to indict him, but also had not even prepared the draft of the indictment he planned to file if he did not change his mind following the hearing. The court suggested that in the future, the Attorney-General only announce his final decision about whether or not to indict a suspect after holding the hearing.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town