High Court to rule on Maccabim fence

January 9, 2006 00:00
1 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The High Court of Justice is due Monday to hand down its ruling on the Defense Ministry's proposal for the route of the security fence in the area separating Maccabim-Reut from the Palestinian village of Beit Sira. The current route is the third proposal suggested by the army since it began to work on the central section of the fence between Elkana and the western boundary of Jerusalem. Residents of Beit Sira argued that the fence still separated village farmers from dozens of dunams of agricultural land on the "Israeli" side of the fence. The residents of Maccabim-Reut maintained that the fence was too close to their homes and put them in danger of terrorist attacks. The original route placed thousands of dunams of Beit Sira's agricultural land on the "Israeli" side of the fence, and was rejected by the High Court of Justice in its landmark ruling on what is known as the Beit Surik petition. That petition covered a 40-kilometer-long segment of the fence and rejected three-quarters of it, including the section around Beit Sira. The court ruled that the government had failed to establish a proper balance between Israel's security needs and the well-being of the Palestinians. The Defense Ministry then proposed a second route, which moved the fence away from the periphery of Beit Sira but still separated the farmers from much of their land. The fence was meant to allow construction of a road linking Modi'in with the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway. The new route of the fence rules out the possibility of building the road.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town