'Lador knew his letter would cause upset'

Lador knew his letter w

By DAN IZENBERG
November 4, 2009 23:48
2 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

State Attorney Moshe Lador is sorry that his letter has aroused more gossip than attention to the issues he raised, a source who asked for anonymity said Wednesday. Lador, he said, had hoped that the discussion the letter triggered would have been about the alleged problems and threat to the rule of law emanating from the reform that Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman announced on Monday. The reform involves splitting the functions of the attorney-general into two separate positions and splitting the State Attorney's Office into two separate institutions, one dealing with criminal matters, to be headed by a chief prosecutor, and the other dealing with civil and administrative affairs, to be headed by the new government legal adviser. The gossip the source was referring to was the reports that Neeman, who strongly reprimanded Lador after receiving the letter, would fire him. Those reports were denied by Neeman himself on Wednesday. But the source close to Lador said the reprimand itself was worrying because in it, Neeman had compared Lador's public letter to that of a general who criticizes the defense minister in public or a senior police officer who criticizes the public security minister. "Neeman treated Lador as if he were an ordinary clerk who is directly subordinate to the minister," the source said. "This is not true of Lador or Attorney-General Menachem Mazuz, who do not answer to the minister." The source said that in releasing the letter to the public, Lador knew that it would cause controversy. But he added that many staffers in the State Attorney's Office said afterwards they were proud of Lador because he had shown great courage in speaking out against the plan which was being developed "in such a strange way." The source also denied Neeman's statement that he had discussed the overhaul with Lador and Mazuz in detail. "It's true that Neeman raised the subject, but he did so in a vague way and without providing details," the source said. Lador is due to return from the US by the end of the week and will be back at work on Sunday. But among the questions that need answers is not only whether Neeman will fire Lador, but what Lador will do if Neeman chooses to ignore his letter and the cabinet approves his proposal. In another development, the Legal Forum for the Land of Israel filed a complaint against Lador with the Civil Service commissioner and asked him to bring the state attorney before a disciplinary court for speaking out against the minister's plan and attacking him in public. Former Civil Service commissioner Avraham Friedman told The Jerusalem Post that the question of whether sanctions should be taken against Lador was a complex one. There is no question that disciplinary action would be required against an ordinary civil servant who criticized the minister and ministerial policy in public, he said. But is not so obvious in the case of Lador, who is a senior official that does not require permission from the ministry to talk to the media and express his views in public. Furthermore, Lador belongs to a limited number of civil servants in the government who do not have to answer to the political echelon. Friedman added that in most cases, even civil servants of Lador's status should not criticize ministerial decisions. "But in exceptional cases, where a black flag flies above it, criticism of the minister in public may be justified," he said. The question is whether or not Neeman's plan is one of these exceptional cases. Friedman said Neeman and Lador should try to find a compromise. Both of them had acted aggressively, he added, and suggested that the prime minister mediate between them.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN