Olmert faces fourth indictment

Prosecution awaiting pretrial hearing in sinecures case.

By DAN IZENBERG
May 4, 2010 04:12
4 minute read.
Olmert poses for the media before reading a statem

Olmert reads statement 311. (photo credit: Associated Press)

Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is now facing the likelihood of a fourth indictment, on charges that he handed out sinecures in the Authority for Small-and Medium-Sized Business to senior Likud Party members whose political support he needed  while serving as Minister of Industry, Commerce and Employment in 2004 and 2005.

The decision to indict him is conditional on the outcome of a hearing which the state prosecution is offering Olmert’s lawyers. Olmert waived his right to a hearing regarding three other affairs in which he has already been indicted, Rishontours, Talansky and the Investment Center.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


“The head of the Economic Department in the State Attorney’s Office informed the attorneys of Mr. Ehud Olmert and Mr. Oved Yehezkel that ... the possibility is being considered of trying them on criminal charges regarding suspicions that they committed violations in this affair,” the Justice Ministry spokesman announced.

“The main suspicions are that throughout this period ... the suspects exploited their status and prerogatives in the various ministries they controlled and acted, in a conflict of interests, in an organized, systematic and broad manner to advance the interests of members of the Likud Central Committee, Likud activists and their friends.

“They did this in order to do them favors and to please them by helping them find work, and in responding to their requests on different matters involving the civil service officials in order to strengthen Olmert’s political position.”

Olmert, who in addition to heading the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Education also served at various times during 2004 and 2005 as deputy prime minister, minister of finance and minister of communications, did favors in various institutions including Bezeq, the Postal Authority, the Employment Service, the Small- and Medium-Sized Business Authority and the Israel Lands Authority. He is also suspected of appointing Likud activists as public representatives in the labor courts.

The state is considering charging Olmert and Yehezkel with fraud and breach of faith and of trying to influence those with the right to vote to vote for Olmert in return for the promise of future favors.

The hearing, if Olmert asks for one, will be held before Deputy State Attorney for Criminal Matters Yehoshua Lemberger. Ministry officials said they would be considerate of Olmert within reasonable bounds, and would try not to make things hard for him in view of the trial currently being conducted against him and “all the relevant circumstances.”



The police questioned 400 witnesses during the investigation, which grew out of a much smaller one conducted by State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss.

Lindenstrauss investigated political appointments in the Small- and Medium-Sized Businesses Authority, which is a non-governmental body whose budget comes entirely from the government via the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Employment.

In a report published in 2006, Lindenstrauss found that Olmert and his director-general, Raanan Dinur, changed the constitution of the authority so that it would be more flexible regarding the appointment of a chairperson and budget allocation.

“After that,” charged the state comptroller, “the heads of the Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Employment used the authority as a springboard for appointments based on political considerations and through improper procedures.”

The heads of the ministry, including Olmert, subsequently appointed a deputy director-general for the authority who had personal and political ties to Olmert. One of her duties was to be responsible for projects. Soon afterwards, the authority established three new projects and appointed project heads for each.

The state comptroller found that all three project heads were members of the Likud Central Committee and that two of them had vied for the Likud secretariat. They were hired according to a procedure which was “not equal-opportunity, and improper,” Lindenstrauss charged. Two of the three projects had not been originally included in the authority’s work program.

On October 14, 2007, then-attorney-general Menahem Mazuz ordered police to investigate the allegations against Olmert and others involved in both this case and the Investment Center affair. Later, the state prosecution decided to separate the investigations, largely because of Olmert’s attorney and close friend Uri Messer, who was involved in the Talansky and the Investment Center affairs.

In response to the Justice Ministry decision, Olmert’s public relations spokesman Amir Dan published the following statement and asked that it be published in full:

“1. The investigation into this matter began more than two years ago and the timing of the prosecution’s announcement at this precise moment raises hard questions with regard to the calculations and good faith of those responsible for it.

2. For the past three weeks, we have witnesses a campaign of unrestrained incitement against Olmert by law enforcement elements even though he has not even been interrogated at all about Holyland and without being asked a single question. The publication of the decision today is a direct continuation of the publications from the previous weeks and is part of a prolonged and planned persecution campaign at a time when we are fully in the midst of a trial. This announcement will have a direct and improper influence on anyone asked to testify during these days.

3. We are talking about a matter which has been blown out of all proportion. There was nothing wrong with the procedure for appointing these job-holders and many of them (in those cases where the law requires it) were even approved by the Ravivi Committee, which is responsible for investigating public service appointments. Furthermore, no improper pressure was applied against anyone to approve these appointments which were made in accordance with all the criteria included in the law.

4. Does the law enforcement system really have nothing else to do or no other way of making a name for itself, other than by Olmert? It is surprising that the state prosecution has not yet begun to investigate Olmert on suspicion that he did not cross the street at a cross-walk.”


Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN