Answers demanded over budget blowout

By MIRIAM BULWAR DAVID-HAY (TRANSLATED)
July 8, 2009 15:18
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Ra'anana city council's audit committee is questioning why the city spent NIS 3.5 million renovating its main street, Rehov Ahuza, when the approved budget for the work was just NIS 2 million, reports www.mynet.co.il. And committee head Ilan Cohen says Mayor Nahum Hofree has not yet answered questions about the massive budget blowout, which could even be illegal. According to the report, in 2007 the city issued a NIS 2 million tender for the renovations, which included the widening, repaving and decorating of the sidewalks along the main street. But the work ended up costing NIS 3.5 million. The report said that by law, a city council could approve an excess in a tender of up to half the original sum, but in this case the excess had been far more. Cohen said the committee had asked for an explanation for the excess, but was told only that there had been a "mishap." "It would be interesting to see if a municipal employee made a mistake of NIS 2,000, or if an ordinary citizen exceeded his building permit by a few meters, if they would classify this as a 'mishap' or a 'mistake,'" Cohen said. He added that it was inconceivable that the city could exceed its budget in this way when it was cutting down other activities and when NIS 500,000 could "feed all the residents of Ra'anana who have no food during holidays." "As head of the committee, I view this breach gravely... this is the public purse and we have a public responsibility to it," Cohen said. A municipal spokesman responded only that the matter was being investigated.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

JERUSALEM: RESETTLED upon its desolation
December 19, 2010
Vying for control of the Temple Mount – on Foursquare

By SHARON UDASIN