My grandfather, for many years a leading figure in American Jewish life, would occasionally share the following quip with me.
“There are two views of sociology,” he would say. “The complimentary view holds that sociology proves the obvious.The more realistic view holds that it proves the false.”
And then he would burst out laughing.
It wasn’t, I admit, a terribly charitable view of a serious discipline. But I loved to see him laugh, so I enjoyed the pleasure the joke gave him. I hadn’t thought of that line of his for a long time, until JTS, the very institution at which he was professor of Bible, recently released its study of the attitudes of Conservative rabbis to Israel.
The study was prepared by Steven Cohen, an internationally respected
sociologist and expert on contemporary American Jewry. It was
precipitated, apparently, by a column I first wrote for The Jerusalem
(“Of Sermons and Strategies,” April 1, 2011), in which I worried
that some number of young rabbinical students has become emotionally
distanced from Israel.
I had shared a number of anecdotes that seemed to me worrisome: one
student who needed a new tallit and asked for advice as to where to
purchase one, but who insisted that it must not have been made in
Israel, or another student who chose to celebrate his birthday with
friends in a bar in Ramallah, with PLO posters still adorning the wall.
We are witness, I wrote then and still believe, to a significant shift
in the attitudes of the future leaders of American Jewish life; without
some major change, American support for Israel – which proved
instrumental at the United Nations during the week before Rosh Hashana –
could well begin to wither.
The straw that broke the camel’s back, however, was a longer piece I
wrote in Commentary
(June 2011), in which I argued that what is truly at
play is not only this generation’s attitude to Israel, but rather the
fact that it is much more committed to universalism than it is to
particularism. They are much more comfortable seeing themselves as part
of a global human family than they are extolling the virtues of
belonging to a specific people. Their attitudes to Israel follow from
that. For what animates them is not, first and foremost, the
extraordinary rebirth of the Jewish people in its ancestral homeland,
but rather, a conflict between an underdog (the Palestinians) and a
massive military power (Israel). Without a commitment to peoplehood and
particularism, I suggested, such a generation simply will not feel an
instinctive sense that its first obligation is the defense of the Jewish
And I had but one concrete suggestion: “Addressing that need is going to
require that rabbinical schools cease circling the wagons, and instead
acknowledge the depth of the challenge they now face.”
Oh, well. For what is this newly released study if not a classic case of
“circling the wagons”? How surprised ought we to be that the study
shows that rabbis’ attachment to Israel is still strong? They’re just... well, different.
More support the positions of J Street, while fewer support the view
that they associate with AIPAC. Which is, of course, precisely what I
had suggested. But you wouldn’t know that from the wagon-circling
association. The Forward
, not surprisingly, relished the apparent
“disproof” of my thesis. (Haaretz ran a similar article; this, too, was
no surprise.) “Study Debunks Daniel Gordis’ Claim That They Are Anti-
Israel,” ran the Forward
But, of course, I had never said that these students are anti-Israel. I
had said that their attitudes to Israel are shifting. And the study
proves exactly that.
But that is not all that is worrisome about the study.
First (and I admit that this is more amusing than serious), the report’s author got the year of my graduation from JTS wrong.
I found myself actually hoping that the rest of his numbers were a bit
more carefully compiled. But who knows? Second, and infinitely more
important, is the astonishing fact that no one – not the Forward
, no other paper – pointed to the irony that it was JTS (one of
the rabbinical schools about which I’d written) that commissioned the
Would we ask tobacco manufacturers to investigate the relationship
between smoking and cancer? Was even a pretense of objectivity no longer
necessary? Third, what we are witness to is a shift in emphasis from
the particular to the universal, from an instinct that worries first
about Israel’s need to survive to one in which Israel’s social flaws are
Understanding this shift requires lengthy qualitative interviews, not
the sort of questionnaire that we (yes, I was also polled, though I
didn’t participate) were sent via e-mail so that results could be
compiled quickly. The stakes for the Jewish people are too high for us
to pretend to have learned what we have not yet even studied.
And finally, we are to be comforted by the claim that this generation is
simply more J Street oriented? We’re to find solace in their feeling
best represented by an organization that called for a cease-fire in
Operation Cast Lead just hours after the war erupted, before Israel had
accomplished anything? That had said virtually nothing during all the
years that Sderot was being shelled? That lobbied Congress against a
resolution condemning incitement in Palestinian schools? Or that was
“unable to support” HR 867, which rejected the Goldstone Report as
biased and unfair (a charge which Judge Richard Goldstone himself
eventually acknowledged)? How much more clearly could the JTS study have
proved exactly what I’d said? Sometimes, despite my grandfather’s quip,
it’s just the case that sociology proves the true. And what Cohen’s
survey showed was that I was right – all of us who foresee an era of
Israel battling for survival in the court of international opinion have
cause for great concern. Peter Beinart said it best in his
much-discussed New York Review of Books
article: “For several decades,
the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their
liberalism at Zionism’s door, and now, to their horror, they are finding
that many young Jews have checked their Zionism instead.”
Sadly, many rabbinical students are no exception to this observation.
But here’s the good news. Beinart and I agree? Perhaps this will be a
year of miracles, after all.The writer is President of the Shalem Foundation and Senior Fellow at
the Shalem Center in Jerusalem. His latest book, Saving Israel: How the
Jewish People Can Win a War that May Never End (Wiley), won the 2009
National Jewish Book Award. He is now writing a book on the defense of
Israel and the nation-state.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>