Court rules petitions blocked ILA, ISI’s improper land deal

The court awarded NIS 50,000 each to the Israel Nature and Parks Authority and an NGO that filed the petition.

March 21, 2014 06:10
1 minute read.
High Court of Justice

High Court of Justice 370. (photo credit: yonah jeremy bob)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The High Court of Justice on Thursday ruled that a decadeold petition to block the Israel Lands Authority’s attempted preferential treatment of Israel Salt Industries Ltd. had “achieved its goals.”

The favoritism would have translated into more than NIS 100 million in value.

The court awarded NIS 50,000 each to the Israel Nature and Parks Authority and an NGO that filed the petition.

The NIS 100,000 represented costs and attorney fees for the authority and for the Movement for Quality of Government in Israel, which fought the improper preference, including rezoning salt flats in Atlit and Eilat, over 10 years of legal battles.

After years of the petitioners blocking the deal by obtaining a freeze and an interim order from the court, the state finally reversed its approval of the deal on July 21, 2013.

Though the court presented its final findings on Thursday, the petitioners had mostly won their battle when the state backed off.

The courts found that the petitioners exposed “failures in the conduct of the ILA and state agencies” and caused the state to “formulate general policies for granting” the special kinds of land rights in question.

The deal had loopholes, including the fact that most of the valuable land that the ILA was giving would not be used for developing salt-related resources, but would have benefited ISI, the court said.

The court said that the petitioners had raised the issue with the proper authorities before seeking legal intervention, but were ignored.

The Holyland trial may confirm the petitioners’ objection to the ISI deal as unreasonable.

Some of the defendants with connections to ISI are accused of bribing various state authorities to secure the deal.

In the Holyland case, former Bank Hapoalim chairman Dan Dankner is one of 16 defendants accused of bribing an aide of now-deceased state witness Shmuel Duchner.

The aide, Meir Rabin, is related to Yaakov Efrati, then director of the ILA. The alleged bribe was supposedly intended to obtain favorable treatment for ISI, of which Dankner was chairman.

In October 2013, Dankner admitted to paying Rabin to help him navigate the maze of public obstacles to ISI projects, but said he wanted help in handling the issue legally and denied that the payments were bribes.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night