Assad cannot be Syria’s future

Assad no longer controls his own country, having lost territory in the north, where the moderate opposition groups are fighting bravely.

By PHILIP HAMMOND, LAURENT FABIUS
March 3, 2015 22:15
3 minute read.
Bashar Assad

Bashar Assad. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

From the palace where he is hunkered down, Syrian President Bashar Assad is not just waging a war against his own people; he is also fighting to improve his public image.

In the Western media, he is using the terror inspired by extremists to present himself as a partner for us against chaos. Some appear to be swayed by this argument, saying that in the face of extremism, Assad’s injustice and dictatorship is preferable to disorder.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


In reality, Assad is himself stoking injustice, disorder and extremism, and France and the UK are standing firm together against all three.

This is why we should be deeply skeptical about Assad’s apparent agreement to stop shelling a civilian area of Aleppo for six weeks, brokered by UN envoy Staffan De Mistura. We welcome the dedication and effort of De Mistura, and we all want to see a sustainable and genuine reduction in violence. But Assad’s past actions mean we cannot take his words at face value.

See the latest opinion pieces on our Opinion & Blogs Facebook page
 
 

Assad has conducted the civil war in barbaric fashion.

There is a list of war crimes and crimes against humanity, supposedly in the name of the fight against terrorism but committed as part of a systematic regime policy.

We should not forget the use of chemical weapons, the indiscriminate use of violence against Syrian civilians, and the horrific images of torture and murder in Assad’s jails revealed to the world by the regime defector known as Caesar.



The reality is that Assad is considerably weaker than a year ago, and growing weaker still. His army is depleted, with increasing desertions, and he is being forced to recruit mercenaries from as far away as Asia.

He is beholden to his regional sponsors who, like Hezbollah in Lebanon, are the power behind the throne in Syria.

Assad no longer controls his own country, having lost territory in the north, where the moderate opposition groups are fighting bravely. In the east, he is offering no resistance to Islamic State. In the west, al-Qaida affiliates have set up. Assad’s own borders are infiltrated on all sides.

Proposing Assad as a solution to the extremists is to misunderstand the causes of the extremism. After 220,000 deaths and millions of displaced persons, we would be foolish to assume that a majority of Syrians would willingly agree to live under the control of their tormentor. And for us to dash their hopes of a better future for Syria, without Assad, would only serve to make many Syrians even more radicalized, pushing moderate people towards extremism rather than the reverse, and consolidating a jihadi stronghold in Syria.

For our own national security we have to defeat IS in Syria. We need a partner in Syria to work with against the extremists, and this means a political settlement among the Syrian parties leading to a unity government in Syria. This will likely include parts of the existing regime structures, the national coalition and others with a moderate and inclusive vision for Syria, respecting Syria’s different communities. It is clear to us that Assad could not credibly be part of any such administration.

This transition would allow the Syrian people to regain hope for the future, and for us to tackle the root causes of IS. This is where we are focusing our political efforts. It is not an easy task, and we must all play our part in our own way. But France and the UK will spare no effort to achieve this goal.

UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond and French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius set out in a joint article why Assad cannot be Syria’s future.

Related Content

Letters
July 15, 2018
July 16, 2018: Groundless allegations

By LETTERS TO THE EDITOR