How to fight vigilantism

This newspaper by no means justifies vigilantism. But we expect law enforcement to be carried out on all levels.

By
July 18, 2009 21:45
3 minute read.
dromi shai 248 ch 10

dromi shai 248.88 ch 10. (photo credit: Channel 10)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Two important verdicts were handed down last week by two separate courts - one in the south and one in the north. Prima facie, both appear to have grappled with outbreaks of vigilantism. Yet superficial similitude is misleading, hence the two radically different rulings. A Beersheba court exonerated rancher Shai Dromi from manslaughter charges arising from his shooting, on January 13, 2007, at four intruders, killing one of them. They trespassed onto his property, poisoned his guard-dog (not the first such occurrence) and broke into the sheep-pen. Dromi feared for his life. In Haifa, four policemen, all with promising careers in a prestigious unit, were convicted for having plotted to attack local crime boss Michael Mor with explosives. They too claimed to have acted in self-defense because Mor had terrorized them and their families with impunity. After grenades were tossed into the officers' homes, they concluded that "it was him or them." The palpable difference between the two cases was that Dromi was judged to have perceived himself in pressing existential danger. The cops, however, had conspired to thwart a danger that wasn't as immediate. What the two cases do have in common is the fact that at different ends of the country, citizens who are otherwise upstanding members of society resorted to violence - not in order to abet the commission of felonies, but in order to thwart criminals. Effectively, they became vigilantes. A VIGILANTE is one who enacts his own form of justice in response to insufficient or inept protection by authorities. Vigilantism grows in dark, seamy recesses where anarchy reigns. Like the Negev, where no farmer is exempt from the reign of terror imposed by Beduin gangs. The police do little, and rarely arrive even when summoned. Insurance companies will have nothing to do with beleaguered farmers. Their only recourse is paying exorbitant "protection" sums to Beduin "guards" in order to prevent them from absconding with equipment, livestock and/or produce. On Wednesday night, livestock was reportedly stolen from Ariel Sharon's heavily secured farm. The Negev has justly earned the unflattering moniker of Israel's "Wild South." Throughout large lawless tracts - including posh Beersheba suburbs - no entrepreneur, homeowner or driver is safe from predation. THE CONVICTED officers weren't bad apples, but individuals charged with safeguarding the applecart. Isn't it sad that the police were unable to offer reasonable protection to these officers whose safety (and that of their families) was on the line for their community's sake? Most distressing is the fact that the law-enforcers themselves had lost faith in the power of police and the legal system to effectively come to their aid. What conclusions, then, are ordinary citizens to draw? But it isn't only the police who disappoint. The judiciary is just as likely to demonstrate indifference to defending the populace. Last week, the parents of 15-year-old Ma'ayan Sapir - who was raped, tortured and finally murdered near her Rehovot home in 2005 - sued the state for allowing the extraordinarily sadistic juvenile delinquent who attacked her out on furlough from the facility in which he was incarcerated. From age 12, this lout had been involved in drugs, break-ins and inflicting grievous bodily harm. Prior to his "vacation," he assaulted a fellow inmate, carving curses on his victim's body. The police and welfare authorities demanded imprisonment in an adult penitentiary; the court opted for leniency and sent him to a juvenile detention facility, whose inmates are allowed furloughs. His fateful chance encounter with Ma'ayan occurred on his second furlough. THE CRISIS of confidence that results when citizens lose faith in their criminal justice system engenders widespread insecurity both inside the system and out. The citizenry watches helplessly as crime families brazenly do what they please, subverting or terminating witnesses and even intimidating officers. Unavoidably, law enforcement's malfunction is bound to erode the established value system - as evinced in the tragedy of the four officers and Shai Dromi's ordeal. This newspaper by no means justifies vigilantism. In fact, we emphatically and unequivocally oppose it. What we expect is law enforcement - on all levels.

Related Content

July 16, 2018
Erdogan’s victory and Israel’s natural gas exports

By ODED ERAN, ELAI RETTIG