Lana Del Rey brings summertime blues to Israeli audience

Leaving aside the overall pernicious effects of the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, Lana Del Rey’s statements are in and of themselves contradictory and hypocritical.

September 8, 2018 21:33
3 minute read.
Lana Del Rey at the 60th Annual Grammy Awards New York, U.S., (January 28, 2018).

Lana Del Rey at the 60th Annual Grammy Awards New York, U.S., (January 28, 2018). . (photo credit: ANDREW KELLY / REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Responding to political pressure regarding her decision to perform at an upcoming Israeli music festival, singer Lana Del Rey initially wrote on Twitter two weeks ago: “I believe music is universal and should be used to bring us together. We don’t always agree with the politics of the places we play within or even in our own country.... I would like to remind you that performing in Tel Aviv is not a political statement or a commitment to the politics there, just as singing here in California does not mean my views are in alignment with my current government’s opinions or sometimes inhuman actions.”

But then, in an about-face over the weekend – less than a week before the festival – she announced she would be canceling her planned appearance: “It’s important for me to perform in both Palestine and Israel and treat all my fans equally. Unfortunately it hasn’t been possible to line up both visits with such short notice and therefore I’m postponing my appearance at the Meteor Festival until a time when I can schedule visits for both my Israeli and Palestinian fans, as well as hopefully other countries in the region.”

Leaving aside the overall pernicious effects of the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, Lana Del Rey’s statements are in and of themselves contradictory and hypocritical.

First she said that performing in a location is not a political statement. But then she claimed she could not perform in certain locations without a reciprocal performance in other locations – itself a political statement.

These cannot both be true. If performing at a music festival is not political, it would not suddenly become so depending on whether a parallel concert was booked somewhere else.

Second, Del Rey described a standard that when it comes to geopolitical conflict, artists ought to “treat fans equally,” and that in order to do so and remain apolitical they should either ensure reciprocal performances in areas representative of each side, or not perform at all.

But not even Lana Del Rey has followed the standard she set. For example, she has performed in Russia without performing in Crimea or Chechnya; in China without performing in Taiwan or Tibet; and in Turkey without performing in Kurdistan or Northern Cyprus.

Indeed, if on her next visit to the Middle East she is truly hoping to book “other countries in the region,” she would have to visit just about every country in the Middle East to ensure equality among all the parties to various conflicts.

Of course, no parallel is perfect – but if the standard is so strict as to exclude only Israel, while including authoritarian countries like Russia, China, and Turkey, it just reeks of pure bias rather than mere hypocrisy.

In any case, there is a difference between waiting until you can schedule something in both areas of a dispute, versus withdrawing from a scheduled performance in one area due to pressure from supporters of the other.

All of this begs the following questions: Why Israel? Why are only performances in Israel dependent on there being a performance somewhere else? What changed between her first and second statements that made her no longer believe in the first? And how does disappointing her fans by canceling a concert appearance because of their citizenship achieve her stated goal of bringing people together through music? Despite her best efforts to insist otherwise, Lana Del Rey’s cancellation was very clearly a political statement and very clearly a result of pressure. It is just the latest example of Israel being held to a different standard than other countries. By caving to this type of bullying and intimidation, Del Rey has threatened the very independence of music as a means of universal human connection capable of transcending politics and conflict.

I would encourage Ms. Del Rey to reconsider her position. She has a wonderful opportunity to share her music and energy with fans who were eagerly anticipating her performance. Fulfilling her commitment to them does not preclude her from booking future visits on different terms.

The writer is the executive director of the J’accuse Coalition for Justice, a nonprofit organization dedicated to combating antisemitism and anti-Israel bias.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

July 21, 2019
July, 22, 2019: Ship of fools


Cookie Settings